Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov 2:44:45.
doi: 10.1186/s40463-015-0090-6.

Algorithm based patient care protocol to optimize patient care and inpatient stay in head and neck free flap patients

Daniel A O'Connell  1 , Brittany Barber  2 , Max F Klein  3 , Jeff Soparlo  4 , Hani Al-Marzouki  5 , Jeffrey R Harris  6 , Hadi Seikaly  7
Affiliations

Algorithm based patient care protocol to optimize patient care and inpatient stay in head and neck free flap patients

Daniel A O'Connell et al. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine if rigid adherence (where medically appropriate) to an algorithm/checklist-based patient care pathway can reduce the duration of hospitalization and complication rates in patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction with free tissue transfer.

Methods: Study design was a retrospective case-control study of patients undergoing major head and neck cancer resections and reconstruction at a tertiary referral centre. The intervention was rigid adherence to a pre-existing care pathway including flow algorithms and multidisciplinary checklists incorporated into patient charting and care orders. 157 patients were enrolled prospectively and were compared to 99 patients in a historical cohort. Patient charts were reviewed and information related to the patient, procedure, and post-operative course was extracted. The two groups were compared for number of major and minor complications (using the Clavien-Dindo system) and length of stay in hospital.

Results: Comparing pre- and post-intervention groups, no significant difference was identified in duration of hospital stay (21.5 days vs. 20.5 days, p = 0.750), the rate of major complications was significantly higher in the pre-intervention cohort (25.3% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.031), the rate of minor complications was not significantly higher (34.3% vs 30.8%, p = 0.610).

Conclusion: Rigid adherence to our patient care pathway, and improved charting techniques including flow algorithms and multidisciplinary checklists has improved patient care by showing a significant reduction in the rate of major complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lang K, Menzin J, Earlie CC, Jacobson J, Hsu M. The economic cost of squamous cell cancer of the head and neck: findings from linked SEER-Medicare data. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(11):1269–75. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.11.1269. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Husbands JM, Weber RS, Karpati RL. Clinical care pathways: decreasing resource utilization in head and neck surgical patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;121:755–759. doi: 10.1053/hn.1999.v121.a98217. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hanna E, Shultz S, Doctor D, Vural E, Stern S, Suen J. Development and implementation of a clinical pathway for patients undergoing total Laryngectomy: impact on cost and quality of care. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125:1247–1251. doi: 10.1001/archotol.125.11.1247. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dautremont JF, Rudmik LR, Yeung J, Asante T, Nakoneshny SC, Hoy M, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a postoperative clinical care pathway in head and neck surgery with microvascular reconstruction. J Otolaryngol – Head and Neck Surg. 2013;42:59. doi: 10.1186/1916-0216-42-59. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greene JH. Production and Inventory Control: Systems and Decisions. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin; 1974.