Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May;29(2):102-9.
doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549051.

Reduction and Mastopexy Techniques for Optimal Results in Oncoplastic Breast Reconstruction

Affiliations

Reduction and Mastopexy Techniques for Optimal Results in Oncoplastic Breast Reconstruction

Jessica F Rose et al. Semin Plast Surg. 2015 May.

Abstract

Breast conservation therapy has emerged as an important option for select cancer patients as survival rates are similar to those after mastectomy. Large tumor size and the effect of radiation create cosmetic deformities in the shape of the breast after lumpectomy alone. Volume loss, nipple displacement, and asymmetry of the contralateral breast are just a few concerns. Reconstruction of lumpectomy defects with local tissue rearrangement in concert with reduction and mastopexy techniques have allowed for outstanding aesthetic results. In patients who have a reasonable tumor- to breast-size ratio, this oncoplastic surgery can successfully treat the patient's cancer while often improving upon preoperative breast shape. Specific surgical guidelines in reduction and mastopexy help achieve predictable aesthetic results, despite the effects of radiation, and can allow for a single surgical procedure for cancer removal, reconstruction, and contralateral symmetry in one stage.

Keywords: breast cancer; breast conservation therapy; breast reconstruction; oncoplastic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient who underwent lumpectomy without oncoplastic surgery and a cosmetically unfavorable result.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patient who had a vertical skin pattern excision. (A) Preoperative markings. (B) Intraoperative exposure. (C) Preradiation. (D) Final result at 9 months after radiation therapy.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Traditional Wise-pattern markings and tumor identified with wire localization.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Patient with left upper-outer quadrant breast cancer. (A) Preoperative anterior view. (B) Preoperative lateral view. (C) One year after radiation, anterior view. (D) One year after radiation, lateral view, showing reasonable symmetry in a single surgical intervention.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Patient status post right lumpectomy and radiation. (A) Preoncoplastic surgery at time of referral. (B) Intraoperative view showing measurements. Note distance of inframammary fold to the nipple–areolar complex on radiated side is purposefully placed 1 cm longer to account for settling of the contralateral nonradiated breast. (C) Final postoperative result.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. DeSantis C, Ma J, Bryan L, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(1):52–62. - PubMed
    1. Holmes D R, Schooler W, Smith R. Oncoplastic approaches to breast conservation. Int J Breast Cancer. 2011;2011:303879. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen A M, Meric-Bernstam F, Hunt K K. et al.Breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer. 2005;103(4):689–695. - PubMed
    1. Chen A M, Meric-Bernstam F, Hunt K K. et al.Breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: the MD Anderson cancer center experience. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(12):2303–2312. - PubMed
    1. Halsted W S. The results of operations for the cure of cancer of the breast performed at the Johns Hopkins Hospital from June 1889 to January 1894. Ann Surg. 1894;20(5):497–555. - PMC - PubMed