Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov 4:15:159.
doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0137-2.

Optimal pain management for radical prostatectomy surgery: what is the evidence?

Collaborators, Affiliations

Optimal pain management for radical prostatectomy surgery: what is the evidence?

Grish P Joshi et al. BMC Anesthesiol. .

Abstract

Background: Increase in the diagnosis of prostate cancer has increased the incidence of radical prostatectomy. However, the literature assessing pain therapy for this procedure has not been systematically evaluated. Thus, optimal pain therapy for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy remains controversial.

Methods: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies assessing the effects of analgesic and anesthetic interventions on pain after radical prostatectomy. All searches were conducted in October 2012 and updated in June 2015.

Results: Most treatments studied improved pain relief and/or reduced opioid requirements. However, there were significant differences in the study designs and the variables evaluated, precluding quantitative analysis and consensus recommendations.

Conclusions: This systematic review reveals that there is a lack of evidence to develop an optimal pain management protocol in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Most studies assessed unimodal analgesic approaches rather than a multimodal technique. There is a need for more procedure-specific studies comparing pain and analgesic requirements for open and minimally invasive surgical procedures. Finally, while we wait for appropriate procedure specific evidence from publication of adequate studies assessing optimal pain management after radical prostatectomy, we propose a basic analgesic guideline.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA diagram showing identification of included studies

References

    1. Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:212–36. doi: 10.3322/caac.20121. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parker C, Gillessen S, Heidenreich A, Horwich A. ESMO Guidelines Committee. Cancer of the prostate: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2015 Jul 22. [Epub ahead of print]. - PubMed
    1. Liu JJ, Maxwell BG, Panousis P, Chung BI. Perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic compared with open prostatectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Urology. 2013;82:579–583. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.080. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Autorino R, Kaouk JH, Stolzenburg JU, Gill IS, Mottrie A, Tewari A, et al. Current status and future directions of robotic single-site surgery: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2013;63:266–80. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Joshi GP, Schug S, Kehlet H. Procedure specific pain management and outcomes strategies. Best Prac Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014;28:191–201. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2014.03.005. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms