Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep;16(9):1806-26.
doi: 10.1111/pme.12760. Epub 2015 Jun 10.

Acute Pain Medicine in the United States: A Status Report

Patrick Tighe  1 , Chester C Buckenmaier 3rd, Andre P Boezaart, Daniel B Carr, Laura L Clark, Andrew A Herring, Michael Kent, Sean Mackey, Edward R Mariano, Rosemary C Polomano, Gary M Reisfield
Affiliations

Acute Pain Medicine in the United States: A Status Report

Patrick Tighe et al. Pain Med. 2015 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Consensus indicates that a comprehensive,multimodal, holistic approach is foundational to the practice of acute pain medicine (APM),but lack of uniform, evidence-based clinical pathways leads to undesirable variability throughout U. S. healthcare systems. Acute pain studies are inconsistently synthesized to guide educational programs. Advanced practice techniques involving regional anesthesia assume the presence of a physician-led, multidisciplinary acute pain service,which is often unavailable or inconsistently applied.This heterogeneity of educational and organizational standards may result in unnecessary patient pain and escalation of healthcare costs.

Methods: A multidisciplinary panel was nominated through the APM Shared Interest Group of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. The panel met in Chicago, IL, in July 2014, to identify gaps and set priorities in APM research and education.

Results: The panel identified three areas of critical need: 1) an open-source acute pain data registry and clinical support tool to inform clinical decision making and resource allocation and to enhance research efforts; 2) a strong professional APM identity as an accredited subspecialty; and 3) educational goals targeted toward third-party payers,hospital administrators, and other key stake holders to convey the importance of APM.

Conclusion: This report is the first step in a 3-year initiative aimed at creating conditions and incentives for the optimal provision of APM services to facilitate and enhance the quality of patient recovery after surgery, illness, or trauma. The ultimate goal is to reduce the conversion of acute pain to the debilitating disease of chronic pain.

Keywords: Acute pain; Anesthesiology; Delivery of healthcare; Education; Medical informatios; Research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Defense and veterans pain rating scale
Figure 2
Figure 2
DoD/VA pain supplemental questions. DoD5U.S. Department of Defense; VA5U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs DoD: U.S.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Beecher HK. The measurement of pain – prototype for the quantitative study of subjective responses. Introduction to Part 1. In: Beecher HK, editor. Measurement of Subjective Responses: Quantitative Effects of Drugs. Oxford University Press; New York, NY: 1959. p. 8.
    1. Carr DB, Cousins MJ. The anesthesiologist and pain – a historical memoir. In: Eger EI, Westhorpe RN, Saidman LJ, editors. The Wondrous Story of Anesthesia. Springer; New York: 2014. pp. 811–27.
    1. Carr DB. The development of national guidelines for pain control: synopsis and commentary. Eur J Pain. 2001;5(Suppl. A):91–98. - PubMed
    1. Brennan F, Carr DB, Cousins MJ. Pain management: A fundamental human right. Anesth Analg. 2007;105(1):205–21. - PubMed
    1. Lasagna L. Clinical analgesic research: a historical perspective. In: Max M, Portenoy R, Laska E, editors. The Design of Analgesic Clinical Trials. Raven Press; New York: 1991. pp. 1–7.

Publication types