Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Oct 20:6:310.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00310. eCollection 2015.

Genotype by environment interaction and breeding for robustness in livestock

Affiliations
Review

Genotype by environment interaction and breeding for robustness in livestock

Wendy M Rauw et al. Front Genet. .

Abstract

The increasing size of the human population is projected to result in an increase in meat consumption. However, at the same time, the dominant position of meat as the center of meals is on the decline. Modern objections to the consumption of meat include public concerns with animal welfare in livestock production systems. Animal breeding practices have become part of the debate since it became recognized that animals in a population that have been selected for high production efficiency are more at risk for behavioral, physiological and immunological problems. As a solution, animal breeding practices need to include selection for robustness traits, which can be implemented through the use of reaction norms analysis, or though the direct inclusion of robustness traits in the breeding objective and in the selection index. This review gives an overview of genotype × environment interactions (the influence of the environment, reaction norms, phenotypic plasticity, canalization, and genetic homeostasis), reaction norms analysis in livestock production, options for selection for increased levels of production and against environmental sensitivity, and direct inclusion of robustness traits in the selection index. Ethical considerations of breeding for improved animal welfare are discussed. The discussion on animal breeding practices has been initiated and is very alive today. This positive trend is part of the sustainable food production movement that aims at feeding 9.15 billion people not just in the near future but also beyond.

Keywords: animal breeding; canalization; genetic selection; livestock production; phenotypic plasticity; reaction norms; robustness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Phenotypic performance of three different (imaginary) genotypes as a function of an environmental gradient at values –1 (an unfavorable environment), 0 (a “neutral” environment) and 1 (a favorable environment).

References

    1. Allen C., Bekoff M. (2005). Animal play and the evolution of morality: an ethological approach. Topoi 24, 125–135. 10.1007/s11245-005-5050-8 - DOI
    1. Appleby M. C., Fuentesfina D. (2015). “The future of livestock: feeding the world sustainably and humanely,” in Food Security and Food Safety for the Twenty-first Century: Proceedings of the APSAFE2013, ed. Hongladarom S. (Singapore: Springer; ), 99–102. 10.1007/978-981-287-417-7_8 - DOI
    1. Baldwin R. L., Smith N. E., Taylor J., Sharp M. (1980). Manipulating metabolic parameters to improve growth rate and milk secretion. J. Anim. Sci. 51, 1416–1428. - PubMed
    1. Beilharz R. G., Luxford B. G., Wilkinson J. L. (1993). Quantitative genetics and evolution: is our understanding of genetics sufficient to explain evolution? J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 110, 161–170. 10.1111/j.1439-0388.1993.tb00728.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bonnier G. (1894). Recherches expérimentales sur l’adaptation des plantes au climat alpin. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. Biol. Vég. 20, 217–360.

LinkOut - more resources