Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Oct 21:3:241.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00241. eCollection 2015.

Biosafety and Biosecurity: A Relative Risk-Based Framework for Safer, More Secure, and Sustainable Laboratory Capacity Building

Petra Dickmann  1 , Heather Sheeley  2 , Nigel Lightfoot  3
Affiliations
Review

Biosafety and Biosecurity: A Relative Risk-Based Framework for Safer, More Secure, and Sustainable Laboratory Capacity Building

Petra Dickmann et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Laboratory capacity building is characterized by a paradox between endemicity and resources: countries with high endemicity of pathogenic agents often have low and intermittent resources (water, electricity) and capacities (laboratories, trained staff, adequate regulations). Meanwhile, countries with low endemicity of pathogenic agents often have high-containment facilities with costly infrastructure and maintenance governed by regulations. The common practice of exporting high biocontainment facilities and standards is not sustainable and concerns about biosafety and biosecurity require careful consideration.

Methods: A group at Chatham House developed a draft conceptual framework for safer, more secure, and sustainable laboratory capacity building.

Results: The draft generic framework is guided by the phrase "LOCAL - PEOPLE - MAKE SENSE" that represents three major principles: capacity building according to local needs (local) with an emphasis on relationship and trust building (people) and continuous outcome and impact measurement (make sense).

Conclusion: This draft generic framework can serve as a blueprint for international policy decision-making on improving biosafety and biosecurity in laboratory capacity building, but requires more testing and detailing development.

Keywords: biorisk; biosafety; biosecurity; emerging infectious diseases; international health regulations; laboratory capacity building.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Tran PD, Vu LN, Nguyen HT, Phan LT, Lowe W, McConnell MS, et al. Strengthening global health security capacity – Vietnam demonstration project, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep (2014) 63(4):77–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borchert JN, Tappero JW, Downing R, Shoemaker T, Behumbiize P, Aceng J, et al. Rapidly building global health security capacity – Uganda demonstration project, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep (2014) 63(4):73–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blazes DL, Bondarenko JL, Burke RL, Vest KG, Fukuda MM, Perdue CL, et al. Contributions of the global emerging infections surveillance and response system network to global health security in 2011. US Army Med Dep J (2013): 7–18. - PubMed
    1. Wilson K, von Tigerstrom B, McDougall C. Protecting global health security through the international health regulations: requirements and challenges. CMAJ (2008) 179(1):44–8.10.1503/cmaj.080516 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rodier G, Greenspan AL, Hughes JM, Heymann DL. Global public health security. Emerg Infect Dis (2007) 13(10):1447–52.10.3201/eid1310.070732 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources