Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan:45:15-23.
doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.09.003.

Evaluating the attractiveness of a new light rail extension: Testing simple change and displacement change hypotheses

Affiliations

Evaluating the attractiveness of a new light rail extension: Testing simple change and displacement change hypotheses

Carol M Werner et al. Transp Policy (Oxf). 2016 Jan.

Abstract

Many communities in the United States have been adding new light rail to bus-predominant public transit systems. However, there is disagreement as to whether opening light rail lines attracts new ridership or merely draws ridership from existing transit users. We study a new light rail line in Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, which is part of a complete street redevelopment. We utilize a pre-test post-test control group quasi-experimental design to test two different measures of ridership change. The first measure is calculated from stops along the light rail route; the second assumes that nearby bus stops might be displaced by the rail and calculates ridership change with those stops included as baseline. Both the simple measure (transit use changes on the complete street light rail corridor) and the "displacement" measure (transit use changes in the one-quarter mile catchment areas around new light rail stops) showed significant (p < .01) and substantial (677%) increases in transit passengers compared to pre-light rail bus users. In particular, the displacement analysis discredits a common challenge that when a new light rail line opens, most passengers are simply former bus riders whose routes were canceled in favor of light rail. The study suggests that light rail services can attract additional ridership to public transit systems. In addition, although pre-post control-group designs require time and effort, this project underscores the benefits of such quasi-experimental designs in terms of the strength of the inferences that can be drawn about the impacts of new transit infrastructure and services.

Keywords: Bus; Complete streets; Light rail; Ridership.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of study area showing the one-fourth mile street network walking distance above and below the intervention corridor and control areas one-fourth mile beyond that.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Displacement analysis: Bus and rail ridership over time for control and new North Temple rail areas. Percent change is shown in Table 2.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Ridership count locations and ridership changes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baum-Snow N, Kahn ME. The effects of new public projects to expand urban rail transit. J. Public Econ. 2000;77:241–263.
    1. Baum-snow N, Kahn ME. Effects of urban rail transit expansions: evidence from –sixteen cities, 1970–2000. Brook.-Whart. Pap. Urban Aff. 2005:147–206.
    1. Ben-akiva M, Morikawa T. Comparing ridership attraction of rail and bus. Transp. Policy. 2002;9:107–116.
    1. Boarnet MG, Hong A, Lee J, Wang X, Wang W, Houston D, Spears S. The exposition light rail line study: a before and after study of the impact of new light rail transit service. Transp. Res. Board. 2013
    1. Boyle DK. Passenger Counting Technologies and Procedures. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1998.

LinkOut - more resources