Evaluating the attractiveness of a new light rail extension: Testing simple change and displacement change hypotheses
- PMID: 26543329
- PMCID: PMC4629857
- DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.09.003
Evaluating the attractiveness of a new light rail extension: Testing simple change and displacement change hypotheses
Abstract
Many communities in the United States have been adding new light rail to bus-predominant public transit systems. However, there is disagreement as to whether opening light rail lines attracts new ridership or merely draws ridership from existing transit users. We study a new light rail line in Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, which is part of a complete street redevelopment. We utilize a pre-test post-test control group quasi-experimental design to test two different measures of ridership change. The first measure is calculated from stops along the light rail route; the second assumes that nearby bus stops might be displaced by the rail and calculates ridership change with those stops included as baseline. Both the simple measure (transit use changes on the complete street light rail corridor) and the "displacement" measure (transit use changes in the one-quarter mile catchment areas around new light rail stops) showed significant (p < .01) and substantial (677%) increases in transit passengers compared to pre-light rail bus users. In particular, the displacement analysis discredits a common challenge that when a new light rail line opens, most passengers are simply former bus riders whose routes were canceled in favor of light rail. The study suggests that light rail services can attract additional ridership to public transit systems. In addition, although pre-post control-group designs require time and effort, this project underscores the benefits of such quasi-experimental designs in terms of the strength of the inferences that can be drawn about the impacts of new transit infrastructure and services.
Keywords: Bus; Complete streets; Light rail; Ridership.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Residents' expectations for new rail stops: Optimistic neighborhood perceptions relate to subsequent transit ridership.Transportation (Amst). 2019 Feb;46(1):125-146. doi: 10.1007/s11116-017-9793-z. Epub 2017 Jun 28. Transportation (Amst). 2019. PMID: 30983645 Free PMC article.
-
Transit Rider Body Mass Index Before and After Completion of Street Light-Rail Line in Utah.Am J Public Health. 2017 Sep;107(9):1484-1486. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303899. Epub 2017 Jul 20. Am J Public Health. 2017. PMID: 28727533 Free PMC article.
-
The Causal Effect of Bus Rapid Transit on Changes in Transit Ridership.J Public Trans. 2017;20(1):91-103. doi: 10.5038/2375-0901.20.1.5. J Public Trans. 2017. PMID: 28989271 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of new rapid transit on physical activity: A meta-analysis.Prev Med Rep. 2018 Mar 11;10:184-190. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.03.008. eCollection 2018 Jun. Prev Med Rep. 2018. PMID: 29868365 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Physical Activity Levels and New Public Transit: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Am J Prev Med. 2019 Mar;56(3):464-473. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.10.022. Am J Prev Med. 2019. PMID: 30777164
Cited by
-
The TROLLEY Study: assessing travel, health, and equity impacts of a new light rail transit investment during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 2;22(1):1475. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13834-1. BMC Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35918683 Free PMC article.
-
Correlates of Walking for Travel in Seven European Cities: The PASTA Project.Environ Health Perspect. 2019 Sep;127(9):97003. doi: 10.1289/EHP4603. Epub 2019 Sep 18. Environ Health Perspect. 2019. PMID: 31532248 Free PMC article.
-
Walkability, complete streets, and gender: Who benefits most?Health Place. 2017 Nov;48:80-89. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.09.007. Health Place. 2017. PMID: 29024906 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Baum-Snow N, Kahn ME. The effects of new public projects to expand urban rail transit. J. Public Econ. 2000;77:241–263.
-
- Baum-snow N, Kahn ME. Effects of urban rail transit expansions: evidence from –sixteen cities, 1970–2000. Brook.-Whart. Pap. Urban Aff. 2005:147–206.
-
- Ben-akiva M, Morikawa T. Comparing ridership attraction of rail and bus. Transp. Policy. 2002;9:107–116.
-
- Boarnet MG, Hong A, Lee J, Wang X, Wang W, Houston D, Spears S. The exposition light rail line study: a before and after study of the impact of new light rail transit service. Transp. Res. Board. 2013
-
- Boyle DK. Passenger Counting Technologies and Procedures. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1998.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources