Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun 17;2(6):140460.
doi: 10.1098/rsos.140460. eCollection 2015 Jun.

Spatial modelling of type II diabetes outcomes: a systematic review of approaches used

Affiliations

Spatial modelling of type II diabetes outcomes: a systematic review of approaches used

Jannah Baker et al. R Soc Open Sci. .

Abstract

With the rising incidence of type II diabetes mellitus (DM II) worldwide, methods to identify high-risk geographical areas have become increasingly important. In this comprehensive review following Cochrane Collaboration guidelines, we outline spatial methods, outcomes and covariates used in all spatial studies involving outcomes of DM II. A total of 1894 potentially relevant citations were identified. Studies were included if spatial methods were used to explore outcomes of DM II or type I and 2 diabetes combined. Descriptive tables were used to summarize information from included studies. Ten spatial studies conducted in the USA, UK and Europe met selection criteria. Three studies used Bayesian generalized linear mixed modelling (GLMM), three used classic generalized linear modelling, one used classic GLMM, two used geographic information systems mapping tools and one compared case:provider ratios across regions. Spatial studies have been effective in identifying high-risk areas and spatial factors associated with DM II outcomes in the USA, UK and Europe, and would be useful in other parts of the world for allocation of additional services to detect and manage DM II early.

Keywords: diabetes; geographic; mapping; spatial; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study selection and exclusion process.

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation. 2014. IDF diabetes atlas: sixth edition. See https://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas/update-2014.
    1. Billings J, Teicholz N. 1990. Uninsured patients in District of Columbia hospitals. Health Affairs (Millwood) 9, 158–165. (doi:10.1377/hlthaff.9.4.158) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Diabetes UK. 2012. State of the Nation 2012 England. Diabetes. See http://www.diabetes.org.uk/Documents/Reports/State-of-the-Nation-2012.pdf.
    1. Kent J, Thompson S, Jalaludin B. 2011. Healthy built environments: a review of the literature, Sydney Sydney, Australia: Healthy Built Environments Program, City Futures Research Centre, UNSW.
    1. Astell-Burt T, Feng X, Kolt G. 2014. Is neighborhood green space associated with a lower risk of Type 2 diabetes?: Evidence from 267,072 Australians. Diabetes Care 37, 197–201. (doi:10.2337/dc13-1325) - DOI - PubMed