Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep 11;1(1):e1.
doi: 10.2196/mental.3278. eCollection 2014 Jul-Dec.

A Web-Based Intervention for Users of Amphetamine-Type Stimulants: 3-Month Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Robert J Tait  1 , Rebecca McKetin  2 , Frances Kay-Lambkin  3 , Bradley Carron-Arthur  4 , Anthony Bennett  4 , Kylie Bennett  4 , Helen Christensen  5 , Kathleen M Griffiths  4
Affiliations

A Web-Based Intervention for Users of Amphetamine-Type Stimulants: 3-Month Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Robert J Tait et al. JMIR Ment Health. .

Abstract

Background: Among illicit drugs, the prevalence of amphetamine-type stimulant (ATS) use is second only to cannabis. Currently, there are no approved pharmacotherapies for ATS problems, but some face-to-face psychotherapies are effective. Web-based interventions have proven to be effective for some substance use problems, but none has specifically targeted ATS users.

Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a Web-based intervention for ATS problems on a free-to-access site compared with a waitlist control group.

Methods: We used a randomized controlled trial design. The primary outcome measure was self-reported ATS use in the past three months assessed using the Alcohol, Smoking, Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST). Other measures included quality of life (EUROHIS score), psychological distress (K-10 score), days out of role, poly-drug use, general help-seeking intentions, actual help-seeking, and "readiness to change". The intervention consisted of three fully automated, self-guided modules based on cognitive behavioral therapy and motivation enhancement. The analysis was an intention-to-treat analysis using generalized estimating equation models, with a group by time interaction as the critical assessment.

Results: We randomized 160 people (intervention n=81, control n=79). At three months, 35/81 (43%) intervention and 45/79 (57%) control participants provided follow-up data. In the intervention group, 51/81 (63%) completed at least one module. The only significant group by time interaction was for days out of role. The pre/post change effect sizes showed small changes (range d=0.14 to 0.40) favoring the intervention group for poly-drug use, distress, actual help-seeking, and days out of role. In contrast, the control group was favored by reductions in ATS use, improvements in quality of life, and increases in help-seeking intentions (range d=0.09 to 0.16).

Conclusions: This Web-based intervention for ATS use produced few significant changes in outcome measures. There were moderate, but nonsignificant reductions in poly-drug use, distress, days partially out of role, and increases in help-seeking. However, high levels of participant attrition, plus low levels of engagement with the modules, preclude firm conclusions being drawn on the efficacy of the intervention and emphasize the problems of engaging this group of clients in a fully automated program.

Trial registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN 12611000947909; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12611000947909 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6SHTxEnzP).

Keywords: Internet; Web-based; World Wide Web; amphetamine related disorders; cognitive therapy; intervention; motivational enhancement; online; randomized control trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The team who evaluated the intervention were also involved in its development.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. United Nations Office of Drugs Crime . World drug report: Volume 1 analysis. Vienna: United Nations Publication; 2006. [2014-08-25]. http://www.unodc.org/pdf/WDR_2006/wdr2006_volume1.pdf .
    1. Australian Institute of Health Welfare . 2010 National drug strategy household survey. Canberra: AIHW; 2011. [2014-08-28]. http://data.gov.au/dataset/national-drugs-strategy-household-survey .
    1. United Nations . World drug report 2010. Vienna: United Nations; 2010.
    1. McKetin R, Kelly E, McLaren J. The relationship between crystalline methamphetamine use and methamphetamine dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006 Dec 1;85(3):198–204. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.04.007.S0376-8716(06)00147-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kay-Lambkin FJ. Technology and innovation in the psychosocial treatment of methamphetamine use, risk and dependence. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2008 May;27(3):318–325. doi: 10.1080/09595230801914768.791755239 - DOI - PubMed