Risk factors for intra-operative haemorrhage and bleeding risk scoring system for caesarean scar pregnancy: a case-control study
- PMID: 26544025
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.023
Risk factors for intra-operative haemorrhage and bleeding risk scoring system for caesarean scar pregnancy: a case-control study
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate risk factors associated with excessive intra-operative haemorrhage during evacuation operation, and to develop a bleeding risk scoring system in patients with caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) to guide treatment.
Study design: A case-control study was conducted. Excessive intra-operative haemorrhage was defined as active bleeding during dilation and suction evacuation (blood loss ≥200ml). The bleeding group consisted of patients who experienced excessive intra-operative blood loss. Patients with less intra-operative blood loss were included in the control group.
Results: In total, 458 admissions from 2009 to 2014 were included in this study. Compared with the control group, the bleeding group had higher serum β-human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), higher gestational age, larger CSP mass, richer peritrophoblastic perfusion and thinner myometrial layer before evacuation (all p<0.05). Risk factors with p<0.05 on multivariable logistic regression analysis included serum β-hCG >20,000mIU/ml [odds ratio (OR) 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-3.2], gestational age >8 weeks (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-4.0), maximum diameter of gestational sac or CSP mass ≥5cm (OR 7.4, 95% CI 3.4-16.1), myometrial thickness ≤0.15cm (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.9-6.9) and significant peritrophoblastic perfusion (OR 9.8, 95% CI 4.1-23.2). These risk factors formed the final bleeding risk scoring system by conversion of their OR values into corresponding points. A total of 10 points was identified as the optimal cut-off on the receiver operating characteristic curve. Thus, patients with scores ≥10 points were identified as being at high risk of bleeding. The final bleeding risk scoring system had an area under the curve of 0.86, sensitivity of 86.8% and specificity of 73.2%.
Conclusions: Gestational age, serum β-hCG, size of gestational sac, thickness of myometrial layer and peritrophoblastic perfusion were found to be associated with excessive intra-operative haemorrhage during suction evacuation of CSP. A bleeding risk scoring system was constructed to help guide the management of patients with CSP. Patients with total scores ≥10 points were identified as being at high risk of bleeding, whereas patients with total scores ≤5 points were identified as being at low risk of bleeding.
Keywords: Caesarean scar pregnancy; Haemorrhage; Risk factors; Scoring system; Suction evacuation.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Risk factors of persistent cesarean scar pregnancy after dilation and curettage: a matched case-control study.Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;59(2):237-242. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.01.011. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32127144
-
Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Using Ultrasound-Guided Dilation and Curettage.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(5):707-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Jan 20. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26803916
-
Risk factors for massive hemorrhage during the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Feb;303(2):321-328. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05877-9. Epub 2020 Nov 21. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021. PMID: 33219842
-
Analysis of risk factors for intraoperative hemorrhage of cesarean scar pregnancy.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(25):e7327. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007327. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. PMID: 28640149 Free PMC article.
-
Management of cesarean scar pregnancy with suction curettage: a report of four cases and review of the literature.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Jun;289(6):1171-5. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3143-6. Epub 2014 Jan 25. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014. PMID: 24464347 Review.
Cited by
-
Caesarean scar pregnancy: is there a light in the end of the tunnel?Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Apr;307(4):1057-1064. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06888-4. Epub 2022 Dec 28. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023. PMID: 36576560
-
Experience in management of cesarean scar pregnancy and outcomes in a single center.J Int Med Res. 2022 Oct;50(10):3000605221123875. doi: 10.1177/03000605221123875. J Int Med Res. 2022. PMID: 36262051 Free PMC article.
-
Approaches in the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy and Risk Factors for Intraoperative Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Study.Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 24;8:682368. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.682368. eCollection 2021. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021. PMID: 34249974 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and ultrasound parameters in prediction of excessive hemorrhage during management of cesarean scar pregnancy.Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 Jun 30;13:807-812. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S139682. eCollection 2017. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017. PMID: 28721061 Free PMC article.
-
The value of 3-dimensional color Doppler in predicting intraoperative hemorrhage for cesarean scar pregnancy.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(33):e11969. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011969. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 30113503 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical