Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec:195:141-145.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.023. Epub 2015 Jul 8.

Risk factors for intra-operative haemorrhage and bleeding risk scoring system for caesarean scar pregnancy: a case-control study

Affiliations

Risk factors for intra-operative haemorrhage and bleeding risk scoring system for caesarean scar pregnancy: a case-control study

Q Wang et al. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate risk factors associated with excessive intra-operative haemorrhage during evacuation operation, and to develop a bleeding risk scoring system in patients with caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) to guide treatment.

Study design: A case-control study was conducted. Excessive intra-operative haemorrhage was defined as active bleeding during dilation and suction evacuation (blood loss ≥200ml). The bleeding group consisted of patients who experienced excessive intra-operative blood loss. Patients with less intra-operative blood loss were included in the control group.

Results: In total, 458 admissions from 2009 to 2014 were included in this study. Compared with the control group, the bleeding group had higher serum β-human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), higher gestational age, larger CSP mass, richer peritrophoblastic perfusion and thinner myometrial layer before evacuation (all p<0.05). Risk factors with p<0.05 on multivariable logistic regression analysis included serum β-hCG >20,000mIU/ml [odds ratio (OR) 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-3.2], gestational age >8 weeks (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-4.0), maximum diameter of gestational sac or CSP mass ≥5cm (OR 7.4, 95% CI 3.4-16.1), myometrial thickness ≤0.15cm (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.9-6.9) and significant peritrophoblastic perfusion (OR 9.8, 95% CI 4.1-23.2). These risk factors formed the final bleeding risk scoring system by conversion of their OR values into corresponding points. A total of 10 points was identified as the optimal cut-off on the receiver operating characteristic curve. Thus, patients with scores ≥10 points were identified as being at high risk of bleeding. The final bleeding risk scoring system had an area under the curve of 0.86, sensitivity of 86.8% and specificity of 73.2%.

Conclusions: Gestational age, serum β-hCG, size of gestational sac, thickness of myometrial layer and peritrophoblastic perfusion were found to be associated with excessive intra-operative haemorrhage during suction evacuation of CSP. A bleeding risk scoring system was constructed to help guide the management of patients with CSP. Patients with total scores ≥10 points were identified as being at high risk of bleeding, whereas patients with total scores ≤5 points were identified as being at low risk of bleeding.

Keywords: Caesarean scar pregnancy; Haemorrhage; Risk factors; Scoring system; Suction evacuation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances