Neural interfaces for somatosensory feedback: bringing life to a prosthesis
- PMID: 26544029
- PMCID: PMC5517303
- DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000266
Neural interfaces for somatosensory feedback: bringing life to a prosthesis
Abstract
Purpose of review: When an individual loses a limb, he/she loses touch with the world and with the people around him/her. Somatosensation is critical to the feeling of connection and control of one's own body. Decades of attempts to replace lost somatosensation by sensory substitutions have been ineffective outside of the laboratory. This review discusses important recent results demonstrating chronic somatosensory restoration through direct peripheral nerve stimulation.
Recent findings: Stimulation of peripheral nerves results in somatosensory perception on the phantom limb. Sensations are localized to several independent and functionally relevant locations, such as the fingertips, thenar eminence, ulnar border and dorsal surface. Patterns in stimulation intensity change the perception experience by the user, opening new dimensions on neuromodulation.
Summary: Neural interfaces with sophisticated stimulation paradigms create a user's perception of his/her hand to touch and manipulate objects. The pattern of intensity and frequency of stimulation is critical to the quality and intensity of perceived sensation. Restoring feeling has allowed the individuals to, 'feel [my] hand for the first time since the accident,' and 'feel [my] wife touch my hand'. Individuals using a prosthetic hand with sensation can pull cherries and grapes from the stem, open water bottles and move objects without destroying these objects - all while audio and visually deprived. After regaining sensation, phantom pain is eliminated in individuals that had frequent, sometimes debilitating, pain following limb loss. With over 5 subject-years of experience, this work is leading the evolution of a new era in prostheses. Somatosensory prosthetics as a standard procedure to augment and restore somatosensation are now within our reach.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Sensory restoration by epidural stimulation of the lateral spinal cord in upper-limb amputees.Elife. 2020 Jul 21;9:e54349. doi: 10.7554/eLife.54349. Elife. 2020. PMID: 32691733 Free PMC article.
-
A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception.Sci Transl Med. 2014 Oct 8;6(257):257ra138. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008669. Sci Transl Med. 2014. PMID: 25298320 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial tactile and proprioceptive feedback improves performance and confidence on object identification tasks.PLoS One. 2018 Dec 5;13(12):e0207659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207659. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30517154 Free PMC article.
-
Peripheral neurostimulation for encoding artificial somatosensations.Eur J Neurosci. 2022 Nov;56(10):5888-5901. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15822. Epub 2022 Sep 25. Eur J Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36097134 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Restoring tactile and proprioceptive sensation through a brain interface.Neurobiol Dis. 2015 Nov;83:191-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.08.029. Epub 2014 Sep 6. Neurobiol Dis. 2015. PMID: 25201560 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Assessing the quality of supplementary sensory feedback using the crossmodal congruency task.Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 18;8(1):6203. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24560-3. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 29670188 Free PMC article.
-
Object Shape and Surface Topology Recognition Using Tactile Feedback Evoked through Transcutaneous Nerve Stimulation.IEEE Trans Haptics. 2020 Jan-Mar;13(1):152-158. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2020.2967366. Epub 2020 Jan 16. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2020. PMID: 31976905 Free PMC article.
-
Restoring After Central Nervous System Injuries: Neural Mechanisms and Translational Applications of Motor Recovery.Neurosci Bull. 2022 Dec;38(12):1569-1587. doi: 10.1007/s12264-022-00959-x. Epub 2022 Nov 4. Neurosci Bull. 2022. PMID: 36333482 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Leg Prosthesis With Somatosensory Feedback Reduces Phantom Limb Pain and Increases Functionality.Front Neurol. 2018 Apr 26;9:270. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00270. eCollection 2018. Front Neurol. 2018. PMID: 29755399 Free PMC article.
-
A worldwide research overview of Artificial Proprioception in prosthetics.PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Apr 22;4(4):e0000809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000809. eCollection 2025 Apr. PLOS Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 40261833 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Biddiss Ea, Chau TT. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007;31:236–257. - PubMed
-
- Resnik L, Meucci MR, Lieberman-Klinger S, et al. Advanced upper limb prosthetic devices: implications for upper limb prosthetic rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:710–717. - PubMed
-
- Biddiss E, Chau T. Upper-limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86:977–987. - PubMed
-
- Biddiss E, Beaton D, Chau T. Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2:346–357. - PubMed
-
- McCloskey DI. Kinesthetic sensibility. Physiol Rev. 1978;58:763–820. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials