Reduction of the number of fetuses for women with a multiple pregnancy
- PMID: 26544079
- PMCID: PMC7104508
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003932.pub3
Reduction of the number of fetuses for women with a multiple pregnancy
Abstract
Background: When couples are faced with the dilemma of a higher-order multiple pregnancy there are three options. Termination of the entire pregnancy has generally not been acceptable to women, especially for those with a past history of infertility. Attempting to continue with all the fetuses is associated with inherent problems of preterm birth, survival and long-term morbidity. The other alternative relates to reduction in the number of fetuses by selective termination. The acceptability of these options for the couple will depend on their social background and underlying beliefs. This review focused on reduction in the number of fetuses.
Objectives: To assess a policy of multifetal reduction with a policy of expectant management of women with a multiple pregnancy.
Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 July 2015).
Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials with reported data that compared outcomes in mothers and babies who were managed expectantly with outcomes in women who underwent selective fetal reduction of a multiple pregnancy.
Data collection and analysis: We planned that two review authors would independently assess trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extract data and check them for accuracy. However, no randomised trials were identified.
Main results: There were no randomised controlled trials identified.
Authors' conclusions: We found no available data from randomised trials to inform the risks and benefits of pregnancy reduction procedures for women with a multiple pregnancy. While randomised controlled trials will provide the most reliable evidence about the risks and benefits of fetal reduction procedures, reduction in the number of fetuses by selective termination may not be acceptable to women, particularly couples with a past history of infertility. The acceptability of this option, and willingness to undergo randomisation will depend on the couple's social background and beliefs, and consequently, recruitment to such a trial may prove exceptionally difficult.
Conflict of interest statement
Therese Dowswell is employed by the University of Liverpool on an NIHR Cochrane Programme grant to work on a range of Cochrane Reviews. In the last three years the University of Liverpool has received a grant from the World Health Organization (WHO) for work on other Cochrane reviews that Therese has worked on. Therese has also received payment from WHO for working on other Cochrane reviews in the last three years. The Funders have no influence on the content or conclusions of the relevant Cochrane reviews.
Update of
-
Reduction of the number of fetuses for women with a multiple pregnancy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD003932. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003932.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 04;(11):CD003932. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003932.pub3. PMID: 23076902 Updated.
References
Additional references
Berkowitz 1988
-
- Berkowitz RL, Lynch L, Chitkara U, Wilkins IA, Mehalek KE, Alvarez E. Selective reduction of multifetal pregnancies in the first trimester. New England Journal of Medicine 1988;318(16):1043‐7. - PubMed
Boulot 1993
-
- Boulot P, Hedon B, Pelliccia G, Lefort G, Deschamps F, Arnal F, et al. Multifetal pregnancy reduction: a consecutive series of 61 cases. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1993;100:63‐8. - PubMed
Boulot 2000
-
- Boulot P, Vignal J, Vergnes C, Dechaud H, Faure JM, Hedon B. Multifetal reduction of triplets to twins: a prospective comparison of pregnancy outcome. Human Reproduction 2000;15(7):1619‐23. - PubMed
Dodd 2004
-
- Dodd J, Crowther C. Multifetal pregnancy reduction of triplet and higher‐order multiple pregnancies to twins. Fertility and Sterility 2004;81(5):1420‐2. - PubMed
Dodd 2010
-
- Dodd JM, Grivell RM, Crowther CA. Multiple pregnancy. In: James DK, Steer PJ, Weiner CP, Crowther CA, Gonik G editor(s). High Risk Pregnancy: Management Options. 4th Edition. Edinburgh, UK: Elsevier Saunders, 2010.
Donner 1992
-
- Donner C, Maertelaer V, Rodesch F. Multifetal pregnancy reduction: comparison of obstetrical results with spontaneous twin gestations. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 1992;44:181‐4. - PubMed
Evans 1994a
-
- Evans MI, Dommergues M, Timor‐Tritsch I, Zador IE, Wapner RJ, Lynch L, et al. Transabdominal versus transcervical and transvaginal multifetal pregnancy reduction: international collaborative experience of more than one thousand cases. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1994;170:902‐9. - PubMed
Evans 1994b
-
- Evans MI, Littmann L, Isada NB, Johnson MP. Multifetal pregnancy reduction and selective termination. In: James DK, Steer PJ, Weiner CP, Gonik B editor(s). High Risk Pregnancy Management Options. 2nd Edition. London: WB Saunders Company Limited, 1994:1023‐9.
Garel 1997
-
- Garel M, Stark C, Blondel B, Lefebvre G, Vauthier‐Brouzes D, Zorn JR. Psychological reactions after multifetal pregnancy reduction: a 2‐year follow‐up study. Human Reproduction 1997;12(3):617‐22. - PubMed
Groutz 1996
-
- Groutz A, Yovel I, Amit A, Yaron Y, Azem F, Lessing JB. Pregnancy outcome after multifetal pregnancy reduction to twins compared with spontaneously conceived twins. Human Reproduction 1996;11(6):1334‐6. - PubMed
Hasson 2011
-
- Hasson J, Shapira A, Many A, Jaffa A, Har‐Toov J. Reduction of twin pregnancy to singleton: does it improve pregnancy outcome?. Journal of Maternal‐Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 2011;24(11):1362‐6. - PubMed
Higgins 2011
-
- Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Hurst 1996
-
- Hurst T, Shafir E, Lancaster P. Assisted Conception in Australia and New Zealand 1996. Sydney: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare National Perinatal Statistics Unit and The Fertility Society of Australia, 1997:6‐24.
Lipitz 1994
-
- Lipitz S, Reichman B, Uval J, Shalev J, Achiron R, Barkai G, et al. A prospective comparison of the outcome of triplet pregnancies managed expectantly or by multifetal reduction to twins. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1994;170:874‐90. - PubMed
Little 1988
-
- Little J, Thompson B. Descriptive epidemiology. In: MacGillivray I, Campbell D, Thompson B editor(s). Twinning and Twins. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 1988.
Mansour 1999
-
- Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA, Serour GI, Sattar MA, Kamal A, Amin YM. Multifetal pregnancy reduction: modification of the technique and analysis of the outcome. Fertility and Sterility 1999;71(2):380‐4. - PubMed
Munks 2007
-
- Munks EB, Edelman AB, Jensen JT, Nichols MD, Burry K, Patton P. IVF patients' attitudes toward multifetal pregnancy reduction. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2007;52(7):635‐8. - PubMed
Porreco 1991
-
- Porreco RP, Burke S, Hendrix M. Multifetal reduction of triplets and pregnancy outcome. Obstetrics & Gynecology 1991;78:335‐9. - PubMed
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
-
- The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Shalev 1989
-
- Shalev J, Lipitz S, Frenkel Y, Barkai G, Goldenberg M, Nebel L, et al. Selective reduction in multiple gestations: pregnancy outcome after transvaginal and transabdominal needle‐guided procedures. Fertility and Sterility 1989;52(3):416‐20. - PubMed
Stone 2007
-
- Stone J, Belogolovkin V, Matho A, Berkowitz RL, Moshier E, Eddleman K. Evolving trends in 2000 cases of multifetal pregnancy reduction: a single‐center experience. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2007;197(4):394.e1‐4. - PubMed
References to other published versions of this review
Dodd 2003
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous