Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan;44(1):209-19.
doi: 10.1177/0363546515610507. Epub 2015 Nov 6.

Small-Diameter Awls Improve Articular Cartilage Repair After Microfracture Treatment in a Translational Animal Model

Affiliations

Small-Diameter Awls Improve Articular Cartilage Repair After Microfracture Treatment in a Translational Animal Model

Patrick Orth et al. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Microfracture is the most commonly applied arthroscopic marrow stimulation procedure.

Hypothesis: Articular cartilage repair is improved when the subchondral bone is perforated by small-diameter microfracture awls compared with larger awls.

Study design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Standardized rectangular (4 × 8 mm) full-thickness chondral defects (N = 24) were created in the medial femoral condyle of 16 adult sheep and debrided down to the subchondral bone plate. Three treatment groups (n = 8 defects each) were tested: 6 microfracture perforations using small-diameter awls (1.0 mm; group 1), large-diameter awls (1.2 mm; group 2), or without perforations (debridement control; group 3). Osteochondral repair was assessed at 6 months in vivo using established macroscopic, histological, immunohistochemical, biochemical, and micro-computed tomography analyses.

Results: Compared with control defects, histological cartilage repair was always improved after both microfracture techniques (P < .023). Application of 1.0-mm microfracture awls led to a significantly improved histological overall repair tissue quality (7.02 ± 0.70 vs 9.03 ± 0.69; P = .008) and surface grading (1.05 ± 0.28 vs 2.10 ± 0.19; P = .001) compared with larger awls. The small-diameter awl decreased relative bone volume of the subarticular spongiosa (bone volume/tissue volume ratio: 23.81% ± 3.37% vs 30.58% ± 2.46%; P = .011). Subchondral bone cysts and intralesional osteophytes were frequently observed after either microfracture treatment. Macroscopic grading, DNA, proteoglycan, and type I and type II collagen contents as well as degenerative changes within the adjacent cartilage remained unaffected by the awl diameter.

Conclusion: Small-diameter microfracture awls improve articular cartilage repair in the translational sheep model more effectively than do larger awls.

Clinical relevance: These data support the use of small microfracture instruments for the surgical treatment of cartilage defects and warrant prolonged clinical investigations.

Keywords: articular cartilage; marrow stimulation; microfracture; sheep; subchondral bone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types