Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Apr 10;343(1):89-95.
doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.10.038. Epub 2015 Nov 4.

Regulation of invadopodia by mechanical signaling

Affiliations
Review

Regulation of invadopodia by mechanical signaling

Aron Parekh et al. Exp Cell Res. .

Abstract

Mechanical rigidity in the tumor microenvironment is associated with a high risk of tumor formation and aggressiveness. Adhesion-based signaling driven by a rigid microenvironment is thought to facilitate invasion and migration of cancer cells away from primary tumors. Proteolytic degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM) is a key component of this process and is mediated by subcellular actin-rich structures known as invadopodia. Both ECM rigidity and cellular traction stresses promote invadopodia formation and activity, suggesting a role for these structures in mechanosensing. The presence and activity of mechanosensitive adhesive and signaling components at invadopodia further indicates the potential for these structures to utilize myosin-dependent forces to probe and remodel their ECM environments. Here, we provide a brief review of the role of adhesion-based mechanical signaling in controlling invadopodia and invasive cancer behavior.

Keywords: Actin; Adhesion; Contractility; Extracellular matrix; Invadopodia; Invasion; Mechanotransduction; Proteinases; Secretion; Signaling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Invadopodia are actin-rich proteolytic protrusions that are often identified through colocalization of markers with ECM degradation. The in vitro invadopodia assay typically consists of invasive cancer cells cultured on fluoroscently-labeled ECM, in this case FITC-fibronectin-coated crosslinked gelatin. After 6-48 h, the cells are fixed and stained for molecular markers of invadopodia including actin filaments, cortactin, Arp2/3 complex, Tks5, and/or MT1-MMP [44, 45, 76, 99, 108, 109, 119]. In this case, invadopodia are identified by colocalization (purple) of actin filaments (blue) and MT1-MMP (red) using confocal microscopy imaging. Mature invadopodia are further recognized by colocalization of invadopodia markers with areas of ECM degradation (black holes in the green FITC-labeled fibronectin).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Adhesion-based signaling in invadopodia. Signaling through β1 integrins at and/or around the actin cores of invadopodia regulates their maturation and ability to degrade ECM with proteases such as MT1-MMP and seprase [49, 79]. Adhesion rings are strongly correlated with invadopodia activity and are dependent on adhesion and signaling components such as vinculin, paxillin, ILK, and FAK [67, 79]. In addition, invadopodia activity is also regulated by the interactions of β1 integrins with other proteins and/or complexes that include ezrin, Arg, and EGFR [83-85]. Each of these pathways is regulated by Src kinase, which is thought to control early signaling cascades necessary for invadopodia formation [25, 61]. Adhesion rings may anchor and thus stabilize nascent invadopodia and generate NM-II generated shear and tensile stresses. Actin polymerization in the core may generate protrusive stresses, similar to those identified in podosomes [78, 91-93]. Periodic fluctuations in the stresses perpendicular to the ECM surface induce oscillations of invadopodia core and ring proteins [79, 91-93]. Together, these processes may be coordinated to constantly sense and respond to local ECM rigidity. Overall, adhesion based signaling in response to ECM rigidity is an important control point for invadopodia.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Humphrey JD, Dufresne ER, Schwartz MA. Mechanotransduction and extracellular matrix homeostasis. Nature reviews. 2014;15:802–812. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clark K, Langeslag M, Figdor CG, van Leeuwen FN. Myosin II and mechanotransduction: a balancing act. Trends in cell biology. 2007;17:178–186. - PubMed
    1. Roca-Cusachs P, Iskratsch T, Sheetz MP. Finding the weakest link: exploring integrin-mediated mechanical molecular pathways. Journal of cell science. 2012;125:3025–3038. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jaalouk DE, Lammerding J. Mechanotransduction gone awry. Nature reviews. 2009;10:63–73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paszek MJ, Weaver VM. The tension mounts: mechanics meets morphogenesis and malignancy. Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia. 2004;9:325–342. - PubMed

Publication types