Outcomes of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an analysis of the United States Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance Data, 2011-2012
- PMID: 26551441
- PMCID: PMC5023328
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.018
Outcomes of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an analysis of the United States Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance Data, 2011-2012
Abstract
Objective: To assess the characteristics of IVF cycles for which preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was used and to evaluate indications for PGD and treatment outcomes associated with this procedure as compared with cycles without PGD with the data from the U.S. National ART Surveillance System.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: None.
Patient(s): Fresh autologous cycles that involved transfer of at least one embryo at blastocyst when available.
Intervention(s): None.
Main outcome measure(s): PGD indications and age-specific reproductive outcomes.
Result(s): There were a total of 97,069 non-PGD cycles and 9,833 PGD cycles: 55.6% were performed for aneuploidy screening (PGD Aneuploidy), 29.1% for other reasons (PGD Other), and 15.3% for genetic testing (PGD Genetic). In comparison to non-PGD cycles, PGD Aneuploidy cycles showed a decreased odds of miscarriage among women 35-37 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45-0.87) and women >37 years (aOR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.43-0.70); and an increased odds of clinical pregnancy (aOR 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05-1.34), live-birth delivery (aOR 1.43; 95% CI, 1.26-1.62), and multiple-birth delivery (aOR 1.98; 95% CI, 1.52-2.57) among women >37 years.
Conclusion(s): Aneuploidy screening was the most common indication for PGD. Use of PGD was not observed to be associated with an increased odds of clinical pregnancy or live birth for women <35 years. PGD for aneuploidy was associated with a decreased odds of miscarriage for women >35 years, but an increased odds of a live-birth and a multiple live-birth delivery among women >37 years.
Keywords: Aneuploidy; chromosomal abnormality; genetic; in vitro fertilization; preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Similar articles
-
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is associated with reduced live birth rates in fresh but not frozen donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of 18,562 donor cycles reported to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System.Fertil Steril. 2025 Jan;123(1):50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.315. Epub 2024 Aug 10. Fertil Steril. 2025. PMID: 39128672
-
Effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening: a reanalysis of United States assisted reproductive technology data 2011-2012.Fertil Steril. 2016 Jul;106(1):75-79. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.026. Epub 2016 Mar 4. Fertil Steril. 2016. PMID: 26952783
-
Preimplantation genetic screening: who benefits?Fertil Steril. 2016 Sep 1;106(3):597-602. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.04.027. Epub 2016 Apr 30. Fertil Steril. 2016. PMID: 27143516
-
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (abnormal number of chromosomes) in in vitro fertilisation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 8;9(9):CD005291. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005291.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32898291 Free PMC article.
-
Is preimplantation genetic diagnosis the ideal embryo selection method in aneuploidy screening?Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2014 Oct;30(10):491-8. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2014.05.008. Epub 2014 Jun 26. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2014. PMID: 25438679 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Feasibility of combining short tandem repeats (STRs) haplotyping with preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in screening for beta thalassemia.PLoS One. 2022 Dec 7;17(12):e0278539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278539. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 36476827 Free PMC article.
-
Technology versus biology: the limits of pre-implantation genetic screening: Better methods to detect the origin of aneuploidy in pre-implantation embryos could improve the success rate of artificial reproduction.EMBO Rep. 2017 May;18(5):670-672. doi: 10.15252/embr.201743941. Epub 2017 Mar 29. EMBO Rep. 2017. PMID: 28356328 Free PMC article.
-
Unveiling clinic variation in utilization of ICSI, PGT, and blastocyst transfer: a comprehensive study using the SART database (2014-2020).J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Mar;42(3):799-807. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03413-9. Epub 2025 Feb 5. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025. PMID: 39910000
-
The number of prior pregnancy losses does not impact euploidy rates in young patients with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Nov;308(5):1567-1575. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07155-w. Epub 2023 Jul 19. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023. PMID: 37466688
-
Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic screening for women older than 37 undergoing in vitro fertilization.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017 Nov;34(11):1515-1522. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1001-8. Epub 2017 Jul 27. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017. PMID: 28748493 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kuliev A, Verlinsky Y. Place of preimplantation diagnosis in genetic practice. Am J Med Genet. 2005;134A:105–10. - PubMed
-
- Baruch S, Kaufman D, Hudson KL. Genetic testing of embryos: practices and perspectives of US in vitro fertilization clinics. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1053–8. - PubMed
-
- Handyside AH. Clinical evaluation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18:1345–8. - PubMed
-
- Kokkali G, Traeger-Synodinos J, Vrettou C, Stavrou D, Jones GM, Cram DS, et al. Blastocyst biopsy versus cleavage stage biopsy and blastocyst transfer for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of B-thalassaemia: a pilot study. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1443–9. - PubMed
-
- Kearns WG, Pen R, Graham J, Han T, Carter J, Moyer M, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening. Semin Reprod Med. 2005;22:336–46. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous