Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Feb;105(2):394-400.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.018. Epub 2015 Nov 6.

Outcomes of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an analysis of the United States Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance Data, 2011-2012

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Outcomes of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an analysis of the United States Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance Data, 2011-2012

Jeani Chang et al. Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the characteristics of IVF cycles for which preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was used and to evaluate indications for PGD and treatment outcomes associated with this procedure as compared with cycles without PGD with the data from the U.S. National ART Surveillance System.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: None.

Patient(s): Fresh autologous cycles that involved transfer of at least one embryo at blastocyst when available.

Intervention(s): None.

Main outcome measure(s): PGD indications and age-specific reproductive outcomes.

Result(s): There were a total of 97,069 non-PGD cycles and 9,833 PGD cycles: 55.6% were performed for aneuploidy screening (PGD Aneuploidy), 29.1% for other reasons (PGD Other), and 15.3% for genetic testing (PGD Genetic). In comparison to non-PGD cycles, PGD Aneuploidy cycles showed a decreased odds of miscarriage among women 35-37 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45-0.87) and women >37 years (aOR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.43-0.70); and an increased odds of clinical pregnancy (aOR 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05-1.34), live-birth delivery (aOR 1.43; 95% CI, 1.26-1.62), and multiple-birth delivery (aOR 1.98; 95% CI, 1.52-2.57) among women >37 years.

Conclusion(s): Aneuploidy screening was the most common indication for PGD. Use of PGD was not observed to be associated with an increased odds of clinical pregnancy or live birth for women <35 years. PGD for aneuploidy was associated with a decreased odds of miscarriage for women >35 years, but an increased odds of a live-birth and a multiple live-birth delivery among women >37 years.

Keywords: Aneuploidy; chromosomal abnormality; genetic; in vitro fertilization; preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kuliev A, Verlinsky Y. Place of preimplantation diagnosis in genetic practice. Am J Med Genet. 2005;134A:105–10. - PubMed
    1. Baruch S, Kaufman D, Hudson KL. Genetic testing of embryos: practices and perspectives of US in vitro fertilization clinics. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1053–8. - PubMed
    1. Handyside AH. Clinical evaluation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18:1345–8. - PubMed
    1. Kokkali G, Traeger-Synodinos J, Vrettou C, Stavrou D, Jones GM, Cram DS, et al. Blastocyst biopsy versus cleavage stage biopsy and blastocyst transfer for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of B-thalassaemia: a pilot study. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1443–9. - PubMed
    1. Kearns WG, Pen R, Graham J, Han T, Carter J, Moyer M, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening. Semin Reprod Med. 2005;22:336–46. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms