Teledermatology: diagnostic reliability in 383 children
- PMID: 26552595
- DOI: 10.1684/ejd.2015.2658
Teledermatology: diagnostic reliability in 383 children
Abstract
Background: There are few studies of teledermatology focused on the pediatric age group. The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of store-and-forward teledermatology (STD) as a diagnostic tool for pediatricians and to reduce face-to-face consultations.
Material and methods: A retrospective, observational study of 383 children and adolescents under 15 years of age, referred from primary care to Dermatology Department of University Hospital of La Coruña, Spain, between 2011 and 2013, using a STD consult system.
Results: Diagnoses concordance between pediatricians and teledermatologists was 39.2% of cases and partial concordance 16.7%. Agreement for global diagnosis was κ = 0.78 (p = 0.000) and for specific diagnosis was κ = 0.73 (p = 0.000). Management was concordant in 28.7% and partially concordant in 15.4%. Lower reliability was statistically associated with modification of the lesions by inappropriate treatments, incomplete clinical data or bad-quality photographic images included in the referral consultation, diagnosis of infectious diseases and rare dermatoses. The filtering percentage (as the percentage of avoided clinic-based evaluations) was 64.5%. The mean response time of the consultant dermatologists was 3.62 days. Referrals for live consultations due to poor clinical information or insufficient quality of pictures were necessary in only 10% of the cases.
Conclusion: The degree of diagnostic accuracy for the pediatric population using STD as a diagnostic tool was similar to that achieved in adults. Its usefulness for filtering dermatologic referral was also demonstrated in the study, so it could be suitable for integration into the routine practice of pediatricians.
Keywords: dermatology; pediatric; reproducibility of results; telemedicine.
Similar articles
-
Interobserver reliability of store-and-forward teledermatology in a clinical practice setting.Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014 Jul-Aug;105(6):605-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2013.12.007. Epub 2014 Mar 11. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014. PMID: 24626106 Clinical Trial. English, Spanish.
-
Can teledermatology be a useful diagnostic tool in dermatology practice in remote areas? An Egyptian experience with 600 patients.J Telemed Telecare. 2017 Feb;23(2):233-238. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16633944. Epub 2016 Jul 9. J Telemed Telecare. 2017. PMID: 26940796
-
Lessons learned after a three-year store and forward teledermatology experience using internet: Strengths and limitations.Int J Med Inform. 2012 May;81(5):332-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.02.008. Epub 2012 Mar 17. Int J Med Inform. 2012. PMID: 22425394
-
Teledermatology: a review of reliability and accuracy of diagnosis and management.Dermatol Clin. 2009 Apr;27(2):163-76, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2008.11.012. Dermatol Clin. 2009. PMID: 19254660 Review.
-
Teledermatology research review.Int J Dermatol. 2006 Mar;45(3):220-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02427.x. Int J Dermatol. 2006. PMID: 16533219 Review.
Cited by
-
Diagnostic Concordance in Tertiary (Dermatologists-to-Experts) Teledermoscopy: A Final Diagnosis-Based Study on 290 Cases.Dermatol Pract Concept. 2020 Jun 29;10(3):e2020071. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1003a71. eCollection 2020 Jul. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2020. PMID: 32642316 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy, perception, and utilization of pediatric teledermatology: A systematic review.JAAD Int. 2023 Mar 30;12:3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2023.03.005. eCollection 2023 Sep. JAAD Int. 2023. PMID: 37228364 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Travel Avoidance Using Telepediatric by Patients and Healthcare Providers: a Review of the Literature.Acta Inform Med. 2020 Jun;28(2):124-129. doi: 10.5455/aim.2020.28.124-129. Acta Inform Med. 2020. PMID: 32742065 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials