Nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation within the minimally invasive surfactant therapy approach in preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 26553376
- DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308204
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation within the minimally invasive surfactant therapy approach in preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV) as the initial respiratory support within the minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) approach in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.
Design: Prospective, randomised controlled study.
Setting: Tertiary neonatal intensive care unit.
Patients and interventions: This study enrolled 200 preterm infants with a gestational age of 26-32 weeks who showed signs of respiratory distress but did not require intubation in the delivery room. Surfactant therapy was performed using the MIST approach in the patients who met the criteria for surfactant administration.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcomes were a need for intubation within the first 72 h of life and a surfactant requirement.
Results: The infants in the study displayed similar characteristics at birth. Fewer infants in the NIPPV group required surfactant therapy (38% vs 60%; p=0.002) or invasive ventilation during the first 72 h of life (13% vs 29%; p=0.005), and NIPPV reduced the rate of moderate-to-severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (7% vs 16%; p=0.046). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that NIPPV support (OR: 0.36, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.76; p=0.008) and higher gestational age (OR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.98; p=0.041) reduced the need for invasive ventilation within the first 72 h of life. Surfactant requirement was also decreased with NIPPV support (OR: 0.39, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.71; p=0.002). However, there was no impact on BPD, based on the multivariate analysis.
Conclusions: In infants born at 26-32 weeks' gestation, NIPPV reduced the need for invasive ventilation and the surfactant requirement within the MIST approach.
Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT01741129.
Keywords: Nasal continuous positive airway pressure; noninvasive ventilation; minimally; bronchopulmonary dysplasia; minimally invasive surfactant therapy; nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation; preterm.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Similar articles
-
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants <30 weeks' gestation: a randomized, controlled trial.J Perinatol. 2012 May;32(5):336-43. doi: 10.1038/jp.2012.1. Epub 2012 Feb 2. J Perinatol. 2012. PMID: 22301528 Clinical Trial.
-
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis and up-date.Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015 Apr;50(4):402-9. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23130. Epub 2014 Nov 21. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015. PMID: 25418007 Review.
-
Effectiveness of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation vs Noninvasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation as Support After Extubation of Neonates Born Extremely Preterm or With More Severe Respiratory Failure: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2321644. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.21644. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37399009 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of Early Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome.J Trop Pediatr. 2019 Aug 1;65(4):352-360. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmy058. J Trop Pediatr. 2019. PMID: 30239857 Clinical Trial.
-
Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 19;7(7):CD005384. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005384.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37466143 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of Common Nasal Cannulas in Neonatal Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) Using a Novel Neonatal Nasal Model.Med Devices (Auckl). 2022 Sep 1;15:307-315. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S374418. eCollection 2022. Med Devices (Auckl). 2022. PMID: 36072575 Free PMC article.
-
Alternative Methods of Surfactant Administration in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome: State of the Art.Turk Arch Pediatr. 2021 Nov;56(6):553-562. doi: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2021.21240. Turk Arch Pediatr. 2021. PMID: 35110053 Free PMC article.
-
A multicenter, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial, comparing nasal continuous positive airway pressure with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as primary support before minimally invasive surfactant administration for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (the NIV-MISA-RDS trial): Study protocol.Front Pediatr. 2022 Jul 29;10:968462. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.968462. eCollection 2022. Front Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 35967549 Free PMC article.
-
Non-invasive Respiratory Support of the Premature Neonate: From Physics to Bench to Practice.Front Pediatr. 2020 May 8;8:214. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00214. eCollection 2020. Front Pediatr. 2020. PMID: 32457860 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Structural and haemodynamic evaluation of less invasive surfactant administration during nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in surfactant-deficient newborn piglets.PLoS One. 2023 Apr 28;18(4):e0284750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284750. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37115799 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous