Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov;13(6):554-61.
doi: 10.1370/afm.1865.

Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Results in Health Science Mixed Methods Research Through Joint Displays

Timothy C Guetterman  1 , Michael D Fetters  2 , John W Creswell  2
Affiliations

Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Results in Health Science Mixed Methods Research Through Joint Displays

Timothy C Guetterman et al. Ann Fam Med. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: Mixed methods research is becoming an important methodology to investigate complex health-related topics, yet the meaningful integration of qualitative and quantitative data remains elusive and needs further development. A promising innovation to facilitate integration is the use of visual joint displays that bring data together visually to draw out new insights. The purpose of this study was to identify exemplar joint displays by analyzing the various types of joint displays being used in published articles.

Methods: We searched for empirical articles that included joint displays in 3 journals that publish state-of-the-art mixed methods research. We analyzed each of 19 identified joint displays to extract the type of display, mixed methods design, purpose, rationale, qualitative and quantitative data sources, integration approaches, and analytic strategies. Our analysis focused on what each display communicated and its representation of mixed methods analysis.

Results: The most prevalent types of joint displays were statistics-by-themes and side-by-side comparisons. Innovative joint displays connected findings to theoretical frameworks or recommendations. Researchers used joint displays for convergent, explanatory sequential, exploratory sequential, and intervention designs. We identified exemplars for each of these designs by analyzing the inferences gained through using the joint display. Exemplars represented mixed methods integration, presented integrated results, and yielded new insights.

Conclusions: Joint displays appear to provide a structure to discuss the integrated analysis and assist both researchers and readers in understanding how mixed methods provides new insights. We encourage researchers to use joint displays to integrate and represent mixed methods analysis and discuss their value.

Keywords: data display; integrative analysis; methodology; multimethod research; qualitative; quantitative; study design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A joint display from an exploratory sequential design that maps qualitatively derived codes to items. Reprinted with permission from Ann Fam Med. 2012;10(5):443–451.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A joint display from an explanatory sequential design that is organized by a theoretical framework and relates categorical scores to quotes. Reprinted with permission from Ann Fam Med. 2013;11(6):543–549.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A cross-case comparison joint display from a convergent design showing scored items and descriptions. Reprinted with permission from J Mixed Methods Res. 2011;5(2):167–189.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A joint display from a mixed methods intervention design that presents qualitatively derived implementation practices with quantitative screening rate results. Reprinted with permission from Ann Fam Med. 2013;11(3):220–228, S221–S228.
Figure 5
Figure 5
A joint display from a mixed methods intervention design organized by 4 categories of patient treatment benefits. Reprinted with permission from Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(5):1261–1271.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ivankova NV, Kawamura Y. Emerging trends in the utilization of integrated designs in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, eds. Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2010:581–611.
    1. Plano Clark VL. The adoption and practice of mixed methods: U.S. trends in federally funded health-related research. Qual Inq. 2010;16(6):428–440.
    1. Krist AH, Woolf SH, Bello GA, et al. Engaging primary care patients to use a patient-centered personal health record. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(5):418–426. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pluye P, Grad RM, Johnson-Lafleur J, et al. Number needed to benefit from information (NNBI): proposal from a mixed methods research study with practicing family physicians. Ann Fam Med. 2013;11(6):559–567. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wittink MN, Barg FK, Gallo JJ. Unwritten rules of talking to doctors about depression: integrating qualitative and quantitative methods. Ann Fam Med. 2006;4(4):302–309. - PMC - PubMed