Understanding adverse drug reactions in package leaflets - an exploratory survey among health care professionals
- PMID: 26554666
- PMCID: PMC4641349
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-1160-1
Understanding adverse drug reactions in package leaflets - an exploratory survey among health care professionals
Abstract
Background: Current German or UK package leaflets do not contain an explicit notice that the listing of side effects does not imply that they are caused by the drug. Causal interpretations by patients and lay people are frequently observed. The authors examined whether health professionals understand that there is not necessarily a causal relation between drug intake and the frequency of side effects and whether adding placebo comparison improves understanding.
Methods: Exploratory survey consisting of eight assessments, each containing 2-6 survey items, and focus groups with one survey sample using questionnaires on adverse reactions in standard package leaflets and modified package leaflets supplemented with placebo comparison. Participants were convenience samples of 379 health professionals including 153 physicians (80 gynaecologists, 124 diabetes experts - physicians, nurses, and others, 39 medical students in their last year at university, 49 first year health science and education students with completed vocational training and professional experience in various health care professions and 87 pharmacists/pharmacy students). They were asked to rate how often the different adverse reactions listed were caused by drug intake. All surveys were carried out within university seminars and postgraduate lectures from April 2014 to June 2015 in Germany. Response rate was 86 % or higher.
Results: Without placebo comparison, the majority of participants responded that the drug causes adverse reactions with the frequency given in the package leaflet or even more often (95 % of health science students, 100 % of medical students, 60 to 80 % of physicians and 66 % of pharmacists/pharmacy students). Simply adding placebo comparison in a table did not prevent misunderstanding. Analysis of focus groups with health science students supported the lack of understanding.
Conclusions: In the present surveys, health professionals had major difficulties understanding frequency information on side effects in package leaflets. The great majority erroneously implied a causal relation between drug intake and the frequency of side effects, even though most side effects listed are symptoms commonly experienced in daily life.
Similar articles
-
Alternative package leaflets improve people's understanding of drug side effects-A randomized controlled exploratory survey.PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0203800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203800. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30212555 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comprehension of the description of side effects in drug information leaflets: a survey of doctors, pharmacists and lawyers.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013 Oct;110(40):669-73. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0669. Epub 2013 Oct 4. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013. PMID: 24167524 Free PMC article.
-
Experiences relating to adverse drug reactions in the community: a cross-sectional survey among patients and the general public in Thailand.Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016;15(3):287-95. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2016.1135127. Epub 2016 Jan 9. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016. PMID: 26750422
-
Evaluation of patient reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK 'Yellow Card Scheme': literature review, descriptive and qualitative analyses, and questionnaire surveys.Health Technol Assess. 2011 May;15(20):1-234, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta15200. Health Technol Assess. 2011. PMID: 21545758 Review.
-
[Are schizophrenic patients being told their diagnosis today in France?].Encephale. 2017 Apr;43(2):160-169. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Jun 29. Encephale. 2017. PMID: 27372353 Review. French.
Cited by
-
The Unintended Consequences of Adverse Event Information on Medicines' Risks and Label Content.Pharmaceut Med. 2020 Dec;34(6):369-380. doi: 10.1007/s40290-020-00367-4. Epub 2020 Nov 16. Pharmaceut Med. 2020. PMID: 33196966
-
[Health Literacy Among German Health Professionals-To-Be - Exploratory Pilot Study].Gesundheitswesen. 2022 Nov;84(11):1039-1049. doi: 10.1055/a-1657-9627. Epub 2021 Dec 16. Gesundheitswesen. 2022. PMID: 34918315 Free PMC article. German.
-
Assessment of Patients' Views on Drug Benefits and Risks: An Interview Study with Cardiovascular Patients.Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Nov 14;2022:6585271. doi: 10.1155/2022/6585271. eCollection 2022. Int J Clin Pract. 2022. PMID: 36474547 Free PMC article.
-
In Reply.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Sep 21;115(38):637. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0637. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018. PMID: 30373712 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Alternative package leaflets improve people's understanding of drug side effects-A randomized controlled exploratory survey.PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0203800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203800. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30212555 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Working Group of Women’s Health in Medicine, Psychotherapy and Society: [How the pill changes (changed) my sense of self - personal experiences and philosophical thoughts - mother and daughter in dialogue] [German]. 19th Annual conference; 2012/12/05; Berlin, Germany. Available from: http://www.akf-info.de/fileadmin/publikationen/jahrestagungen/jt_2012/6_... [Accessed 2015/09/09]
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous