Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014:2014:867805.
doi: 10.1155/2014/867805. Epub 2014 Jan 23.

Developmental Immunotoxicity, Perinatal Programming, and Noncommunicable Diseases: Focus on Human Studies

Affiliations
Review

Developmental Immunotoxicity, Perinatal Programming, and Noncommunicable Diseases: Focus on Human Studies

Rodney R Dietert. Adv Med. 2014.

Abstract

Developmental immunotoxicity (DIT) is a term given to encompass the environmentally induced disruption of normal immune development resulting in adverse outcomes. A myriad of chemical, physical, and psychological factors can all contribute to DIT. As a core component of the developmental origins of adult disease, DIT is interlinked with three important concepts surrounding health risks across a lifetime: (1) the Barker Hypothesis, which connects prenatal development to later-life diseases, (2) the hygiene hypothesis, which connects newborns and infants to risk of later-life diseases and, (3) fetal programming and epigenetic alterations, which may exert effects both in later life and across future generations. This review of DIT considers: (1) the history and context of DIT research, (2) the fundamental features of DIT, (3) the emerging role of DIT in risk of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) and (4) the range of risk factors that have been investigated through human research. The emphasis on the human DIT-related literature is significant since most prior reviews of DIT have largely focused on animal research and considerations of specific categories of risk factors (e.g., heavy metals). Risk factors considered in this review include air pollution, aluminum, antibiotics, arsenic, bisphenol A, ethanol, lead (Pb), maternal smoking and environmental tobacco smoke, paracetamol (acetaminophen), pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls, and polyfluorinated compounds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
This figure depicts a model following the “Completed Self” paradigm [91] in which the immune system and infant microbiome need to comature without interference or disruption to reduce later-life health risks. The categories of environmental risk factors reported to cause prenatal and/or postnatal disruption are illustrated.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dietert R. R. Developmental immunotoxicology: focus on health risks. Chemical Research in Toxicology. 2009;22(1):17–23. doi: 10.1021/tx800198m. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dietert R. R., DeWitt J. C., Germolec D. R., Zelikoff J. T. Breaking patterns of environmentally influenced disease for health risk reduction: Immune perspectives. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2010;118(8):1091–1099. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1001971. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. House R. V., Selgrade M. J. A quarter-century of immunotoxicology: looking back, looking forward. Toxicological Sciences. 2010;118(1):1–3. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq242. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dean J. H., Luster M. I., Boorman G. A. Methods and approaches for assessing immunotoxicity: an overview. Environmental Health Perspectives. 1982;43:27–29. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Selgrade M. K., Daniels M. J., Burleson G. R., Lauer L. D., Dean J. H. Effects of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene, benzo[a]pyrene and cyclosporin A on murine cytomegalovirus infection: studies of resistance mechanisms. International Journal of Immunopharmacology. 1988;10(7):811–818. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources