Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov;11(11):20150793.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0793.

Aerobic scope explains individual variation in feeding capacity

Affiliations

Aerobic scope explains individual variation in feeding capacity

Sonya K Auer et al. Biol Lett. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Links between metabolism and components of fitness such as growth, reproduction and survival can depend on food availability. A high standard metabolic rate (SMR; baseline energy expenditure) or aerobic scope (AS; the difference between an individual's maximum and SMR) is often beneficial when food is abundant or easily accessible but can be less important or even disadvantageous when food levels decline. While the mechanisms underlying these context-dependent associations are not well understood, they suggest that individuals with a higher SMR or AS are better able to take advantage of high food abundance. Here we show that juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta) with a higher AS were able to consume more food per day relative to individuals with a lower AS. These results help explain why a high aerobic capacity can improve performance measures such as growth rate at high but not low levels of food availability.

Keywords: Salmo trutta; energy metabolism; fitness; food intake; maximum metabolic rate; standard metabolic rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Average daily maximum food consumption as a function of AS in juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta) fed ad libitum (R2 = 0.35). Plotted are partial residuals evaluated at the mean body mass (6.5 g) and SMR (0.66 mg O2 h−1).

References

    1. Hulbert A, Else PL. 2000. Mechanisms underlying the cost of living in animals. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 62, 207–235. ( 10.1146/annurev.physiol.62.1.207) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Biro PA, Stamps JA. 2010. Do consistent individual differences in metabolic rate promote consistent individual differences in behavior? Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 653–659. ( 10.1016/j.tree.2010.08.003) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burton T, Killen S, Armstrong J, Metcalfe N. 2011. What causes intraspecific variation in resting metabolic rate and what are its ecological consequences? Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 3465–3473. ( 10.1098/rspb.2011.1778) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Auer SK, Salin K, Rudolf AM, Anderson GJ, Metcalfe NB. 2015. The optimal combination of standard metabolic rate and aerobic scope for somatic growth depends on food availability. Funct. Ecol. 29, 479–486. ( 10.1111/1365-2435.12396) - DOI
    1. Reidy S, Kerr S, Nelson J. 2000. Aerobic and anaerobic swimming performance of individual Atlantic cod. J. Exp. Biol. 203, 347–357. - PubMed

Publication types