Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct;9(10):CC05-7.
doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/15156.6661. Epub 2015 Oct 1.

Diurnal Variation in Peak Expiratory Flow and Forced Expiratory Volume

Arun Goel  1 , Manish Goyal  2 , Ruchi Singh  3 , Narsingh Verma  4 , Sunita Tiwari  5
Affiliations

Diurnal Variation in Peak Expiratory Flow and Forced Expiratory Volume

Arun Goel et al. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Diurnal variability in airways has most commonly been reported using peak expiratory flow (PEF) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). Characteristics of variability in small, mid and large airways caliber are expected to be different but have not been studied.

Aim: The aim of the study was to assess diurnal variation in small mid and large airways caliber using FEF25, FEF50, FEF75 and FEF25-75 along with PEF and FEV1 in healthy subjects.

Materials and methods: Spirometry was performed in 161 healthy subjects twice in a day. Diurnal variability in FEF25, FEF50, FEF75, FEF25-75, PEF and FEV1 were determined and compared.

Results: It revealed that all parameters exhibit significant diurnal variability. Diurnal variability is highest in large airways and lowest in smaller airways.

Conclusion: Proximal airways show greater diurnal variation in their caliber than distal airways as reflected by greater variability in PEF as compared to FEV1.

Keywords: Airways; Diurnal variability; FEV; FEV1; PEF.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

[Table/Fig-3]:
[Table/Fig-3]:
Diurnal variability of spirometric parameters. Difference in diurnal variability are significant (ANOVA, p<0.05). Error bars represents ± 1 SE
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Casale R, Pasqualetti P. Cosinor analysis of circadian peak expiratory flow variability in normal subjects, passive smokers, heavy smokers, patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and patients with interstitial lung disease. Respiration. 1997;64:251–56. - PubMed
    1. Thiadens HA, De Bock GH, Dekker FW, et al. Value of measuring diurnal peak flow variability in the recognition of asthma: a study in general practice. EurRespir J. 1998;12:842–47. - PubMed
    1. Van Keimpema AR, Ariaansz M, Tamminga JJ, Nauta JJ, Postmus PE. Nocturnal waking and morning dip of peak expiratory flow in clinically stable asthma patients during treatment. Occurrence and patient characteristics. Respiration. 1997;64:29–34. - PubMed
    1. Higgins BG, Britton JR, Chinn S, Cooper S, Burney PG, Tattersfield AE. Comparison of bronchial reactivity and peak expiratory flow variability measurements for epidemiologic studies. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;145:588–93. - PubMed
    1. Neukirch F, Liard R, Segala C, Korobaeff M, Henry C, Cooreman J. Peak expiratory flow variability and bronchial responsiveness to methacholine. An epidemiologic study in 117 workers. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;146:71–75. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources