Efficacy of Transcerebellar Diameter/Abdominal Circumference Versus Head Circumference/Abdominal Circumference in Predicting Asymmetric Intrauterine Growth Retardation
- PMID: 26557588
- PMCID: PMC4625307
- DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14079.6554
Efficacy of Transcerebellar Diameter/Abdominal Circumference Versus Head Circumference/Abdominal Circumference in Predicting Asymmetric Intrauterine Growth Retardation
Abstract
Background: The high incidence of IUGR and its low recognition lead to increasing perinatal morbidity and mortality for which prediction of IUGR with timely management decisions is of paramount importance. Many studies have compared the efficacy of several gestational age independent parameters and found that TCD/AC is a better predictor of asymmetric IUGR.
Aim: To compare the accuracy of transcerebellar diameter/abdominal circumference with head circumference/abdominal circumference in predicting asymmetric intrauterine growth retardation after 20 weeks of gestation.
Materials and methods: The prospective study was conducted over a period of one year on 50 clinically suspected IUGR pregnancies who were evaluated with 3.5 MHz frequency ultrasound scanner by a single sonologist. BPD, HC, AC and FL along with TCD were measured for assessing the sonological gestational age. Two morphometric ratios- TCD/AC and HC/AC were calculated. Estimated fetal weight was calculated for all these pregnancies and its percentile was determined.
Statistical methods: The TCD/AC and HC/AC ratios were correlated with advancing gestational age to know if these were related to GA. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy (DA) for TCD/AC and HC/AC ratios in evaluating IUGR fetuses were calculated.
Results: In the present study, linear relation of TCD and HC in IUGR fetuses with gestation was noted. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV & DA were 88%, 93.5%, 77.1%, 96.3% & 92.4% respectively for TCD/AC ratio versus 84%, 92%, 72.4%, 95.8% & 90.4% respectively for HC/AC ratio in predicting IUGR.
Conclusion: Both ratios were gestational age independent and can be used in detecting IUGR with good diagnostic accuracy. However, TCD/AC ratio had a better diagnostic validity and accuracy compared to HC/AC ratio in predicting asymmetric IUGR.
Keywords: Fetal cerebellum; Gestational age; Growth restriction; Ultrasound.
Figures
![[Table/Fig-1]:](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2342/4625307/853a2b9aa872/jcdr-9-TC01-g001.gif)
![[Table/Fig-2]:](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2342/4625307/f5c9cecf005e/jcdr-9-TC01-g002.gif)
![[Table/Fig-3]:](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2342/4625307/33737a081cd8/jcdr-9-TC01-g003.gif)
![[Table/Fig-4]:](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2342/4625307/67f99121d7c8/jcdr-9-TC01-g004.gif)
![[Table/Fig-5]:](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2342/4625307/af506c757505/jcdr-9-TC01-g005.gif)
![[Table/Fig-9]:](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2342/4625307/8b9d1dcc0c65/jcdr-9-TC01-g006.gif)
![[Table/Fig-10]:](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2342/4625307/5d26292690f6/jcdr-9-TC01-g007.gif)
Similar articles
-
Role of Transcerebellar Diameter and Transcerebellar Diameter/Abdominal Circumference Ratio in Assessing Fetal Growth and Diagnosing Intrauterine Growth Restriction.Cureus. 2024 Jun 19;16(6):e62713. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62713. eCollection 2024 Jun. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39036162 Free PMC article.
-
Utility of sonographic transcerebellar diameter in the assessment of gestational age in normal and intrauterine growth-retarded fetuses.Niger J Clin Pract. 2022 Feb;25(2):167-172. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_594_20. Niger J Clin Pract. 2022. PMID: 35170442
-
Sonographic diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) by fetal transverse cerebellar diameter (TCD)/abdominal circumference (AC) ratio.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1999 Jul;66(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(99)00056-9. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1999. PMID: 10458543
-
Fetal growth velocity and body proportion in the assessment of growth.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S700-S711.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.014. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29422209 Review.
-
Sonographic diagnosis of IUGR-macrosomia.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Mar;35(1):172-84. doi: 10.1097/00003081-199203000-00022. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1992. PMID: 1544242 Review.
Cited by
-
Determination of the Accuracy of Transcerebellar Diameter in Estimating Gestational Age in the Second and Third Trimesters of Pregnancy.Cureus. 2024 Jun 27;16(6):e63292. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63292. eCollection 2024 Jun. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39070496 Free PMC article.
-
Role of Transcerebellar Diameter and Transcerebellar Diameter/Abdominal Circumference Ratio in Assessing Fetal Growth and Diagnosing Intrauterine Growth Restriction.Cureus. 2024 Jun 19;16(6):e62713. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62713. eCollection 2024 Jun. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39036162 Free PMC article.
-
Hepato - Cephalic Index as a Predictor of Intrauterine Growth Restriction.Acta Inform Med. 2016 Feb;24(1):12-5. doi: 10.5455/aim.2016.24.12-15. Epub 2016 Feb 2. Acta Inform Med. 2016. PMID: 27046941 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hasimito K, Shimizu T, Shimoya K, Kanzaki T, Clapp JF, Murata Y. Fetal cerebellum: US appearance with advancing gestational age. Radiology. 2001;221:70–74. - PubMed
-
- Goel P, Singla M, Ghai R, Jain S, Budhiraja V, Babu CSR. Transverse Cerebellar Diameter: A Marker for Estimation of Gestational Age. J Anat Soc India. 2010;59(2):158–61.
-
- Vinkensteijn AS, Mulder PG, Wladimiroff JW. Fetal transverse cerebellar diameter measurements in normal and reduced fetal growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;15(1):47–51. - PubMed
-
- Galan HL, Pandipati S, Filly RA. Ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology. 5th edi. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2008. Ultrasound evaluation of fetal biometry and normal and abnormal fetal growth. In: Callen PW; pp. 225–66.
-
- Campbell WA, Nardi D, Vintzileos AM, Rodis JF, Turner GW, Egan JFX. Transverse cerebellar diameter/abdominal circumference ratio throughout pregnancy: A gestational age-independent method to assess fetal growth. The Am Coll Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77(6):893–97. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources