Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov 12:5:16467.
doi: 10.1038/srep16467.

Inbreeding and homozygosity in breast cancer survival

Affiliations

Inbreeding and homozygosity in breast cancer survival

Hauke Thomsen et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) help to understand the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on breast cancer (BC) progression and survival. We performed multiple analyses on data from a previously conducted GWAS for the influence of individual SNPs, runs of homozygosity (ROHs) and inbreeding on BC survival. (I.) The association of individual SNPs indicated no differences in the proportions of homozygous individuals among short-time survivors (STSs) and long-time survivors (LTSs). (II.) The analysis revealed differences among the populations for the number of ROHs per person and the total and average length of ROHs per person and among LTSs and STSs for the number of ROHs per person. (III.) Common ROHs at particular genomic positions were nominally more frequent among LTSs than in STSs. Common ROHs showed significant evidence for natural selection (iHS, Tajima's D, Fay-Wu's H). Most regions could be linked to genes related to BC progression or treatment. (IV.) Results were supported by a higher level of inbreeding among LTSs. Our results showed that an increased level of homozygosity may result in a preference of individuals during BC treatment. Although common ROHs were short, variants within ROHs might favor survival of BC and may function in a recessive manner.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Population stratification before (A) and after (B) quality control (principal component analysis together with the HapMap individuals with CEU: green, YRI: red, CHB + JT: blue).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of the number of runs of homozygosity in the different population subsets.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Total number and length of runs of homozygosity per person by population subsets.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Correlations between consanguinity measures.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ferlay J. et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. International journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer 136, E359–86, 10.1002/ijc.29210 (2014). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hemminki K., Ji J., Forsti A., Sundquist J. & Lenner P. Survival in breast cancer is familial. Breast cancer research and treatment 110, 177–182, 10.1007/s10549-007-9692-7 (2008). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Enciso-Mora V., Hosking F. J. & Houlston R. S. Risk of breast and prostate cancer is not associated with increased homozygosity in outbred populations. European journal of human genetics: EJHG 18, 909–914, 10.1038/ejhg.2010.53 (2010). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shu X. O. et al. Novel genetic markers of breast cancer survival identified by a genome-wide association study. Cancer research 72, 1182–1189, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2561 (2012). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azzato E. M. et al. Association between a germline OCA2 polymorphism at chromosome 15q13.1 and estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer survival. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 102, 650–662, 10.1093/jnci/djq057 (2010). - DOI - PMC - PubMed