Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Nov;94(45):e1975.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001975.

Comparative Short-Term Clinical Outcomes of Mediastinum Tumor Excision Performed by Conventional VATS and Single-Port VATS: Is It Worthwhile?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative Short-Term Clinical Outcomes of Mediastinum Tumor Excision Performed by Conventional VATS and Single-Port VATS: Is It Worthwhile?

Ching-Feng Wu et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has been widely applied recently. However, there are still only few reports describing its use in mediastinum tumor resection. We present the technique of single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic mediastinum tumor resection and compare it with conventional VATS with regard to short-term outcome.We retrospectively enrolled 105 patients who received mediastinum surgery in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Sixteen patients received sternotomy or thoracotomy, 29 patients received single-port VATS, and 60 patients received conventional VATS (3 ports). The operative time, blood loss, postoperation day 1 pain score, discharge day pain score, and postoperative hospital stay were compared. In order to establish a well balanced cohort study, we also use propensity scores match (1:1) to compare the short-term clinical outcome in 2 groups.No operative deaths occurred in this study. Single-port VATS was associated with shorter operative time, lower postoperation day 1 pain score, and shorter postoperation hospital stay in our cohort study (P = 0.001, <0.001, and 0.039), and propensity scores matched cohort study (P = 0.003, <0.001, and <0.001).Single-port VATS for mediastinum tumor appears to be a safe and promising technique with short-term outcome not inferior to conventional VATS in our cohort study. The long-term oncology outcome may require time and more enrolled patients to be further evaluated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram of patient recruitment.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
(A) Semisupine position for anterior mediastinum tumor (B) semiprone position for posterior mediastinum tumor.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Drainage tube was left for drainage.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Visual analog scale (VAS) score chart card.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Distribution of propensity scores match.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Comparisons between single-port and multiport group: (A) operative time, (B) postoperation day 1 pain score, (C) discharge day pain score, and (D) postoperation hospital stay after propensity scores matching.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Iwasaki M, Nishiumi N, Maitani F, et al. Thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer using the two small skin incisional method. Two windows method. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1996; 37:79–81. - PubMed
    1. Kaga K, Nishiumi N, Iwasaki M, et al. Thoracoscopic diagnosis and treatment of mediastinal masses. Usefulness of the two windows method. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1999; 40:157–160. - PubMed
    1. Yim AP. Video-assisted thoracoscopic resection of anterior mediastinal masses. Int Surg 1996; 81:350–353. - PubMed
    1. Yim AP, Kay RL, Ho JK, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy for myasthenia gravis. Chest 1995; 108:1440–1443. - PubMed
    1. Rocco G, Martin-Ucar A, Passera E, et al. Uniportal VATS wedge pulmonary resections. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77:726–728. - PubMed

Publication types