Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov 9:8:29724.
doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.29724. eCollection 2015.

Potential confounding in the association between short birth intervals and increased neonatal, infant, and child mortality

Affiliations

Potential confounding in the association between short birth intervals and increased neonatal, infant, and child mortality

Jamie Perin et al. Glob Health Action. .

Abstract

Background: Recent steep declines in child mortality have been attributed in part to increased use of contraceptives and the resulting change in fertility behaviour, including an increase in the time between births. Previous observational studies have documented strong associations between short birth spacing and an increase in the risk of neonatal, infant, and under-five mortality, compared to births with longer preceding birth intervals. In this analysis, we compare two methods to estimate the association between short birth intervals and mortality risk to better inform modelling efforts linking family planning and mortality in children.

Objectives: Our goal was to estimate the mortality risk for neonates, infants, and young children by preceding birth space using household survey data, controlling for mother-level factors and to compare the results to those from previous analyses with survey data.

Design: We assessed the potential for confounding when estimating the relative mortality risk by preceding birth interval and estimated mortality risk by birth interval in four categories: less than 18 months, 18-23 months, 24-35 months, and 36 months or longer. We estimated the relative risks among women who were 35 and older at the time of the survey with two methods: in a Cox proportional hazards regression adjusting for potential confounders and also by stratifying Cox regression by mother, to control for all factors that remain constant over a woman's childbearing years. We estimated the overall effects for birth spacing in a meta-analysis with random survey effects.

Results: We identified several factors known for their associations with neonatal, infant, and child mortality that are also associated with preceding birth interval. When estimating the effect of birth spacing on mortality, we found that regression adjustment for these factors does not substantially change the risk ratio for short birth intervals compared to an unadjusted mortality ratio. For birth intervals less than 18 months, standard regression adjustment for confounding factors estimated a risk ratio for neonatal mortality of 2.28 (95% confidence interval: 2.18-2.37). This same effect estimated within mother is 1.57 (95% confidence interval: 1.52-1.63), a decline of almost one-third in the effect on neonatal mortality.

Conclusions: Neonatal, infant, and child mortality are strongly and significantly related to preceding birth interval, where births within a short interval of time after the previous birth have increased mortality. Previous analyses have demonstrated this relationship on average across all births; however, women who have short spaces between births are different from women with long spaces. Among women 35 years and older where a comparison of birth spaces within mother is possible, we find a much reduced although still significant effect of short birth spaces on child mortality.

Keywords: attributable fraction; confounding; contraception rate; family planning; fertility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of crude neonatal mortality rates with those estimated by a standard regression adjustment and by stratifying within mothers. Neonatal mortality ratios are shown for comparing births with preceding interval less than 18 months to 24–35 months [(a) standard regression and (b) stratified regression] and for comparing births with a preceding interval of 18–23 months to those with a 24–35-month interval [(c) standard regression and (d) stratified regression].
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Results of the meta-analysis for the effect of birth spacing on neonatal mortality across 145 DHS, using a standard adjustment for a Cox proportional hazard regression, and another Cox regression estimating the effect of birth spacing on neonatal mortality within mother.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Average parity by survey and for three categories of preceding birth space, for 145 household surveys in 66 countries.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Percentage of short-spaced births that could be matched to another birth for the same mother, in the Cox regression analysis stratified by mother. This percentage is shown for each of 145 household surveys.

References

    1. Rutstein SO. Factors associated with trends in infant and child mortality in developing countries during the 1990s. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78:1256–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Winikoff B. The effects of birth spacing on child and maternal health. Stud Fam Plann. 1983;14:231–45. - PubMed
    1. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Kafury-Goeta A. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006;295:1809–23. - PubMed
    1. Kozuki N, Lee ACC, Silveira MF, Victora CG, Adair L, Humphrey J, et al. The associations of birth intervals with small-for-gestational age, preterm and neonatal and infant mortality: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:S3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arnold F. Assessment of the quality of birth history data in the demographic and health surveys. Report No. 1: an assessment of DHS-I data quality. 1990. Available from: http://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/MR1/MR1.pdf [cited 27 July 2015].

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources