There is poor reliability of Böhler's angle and the crucial angle of Gissane in assessing displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures
- PMID: 26564731
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2015.03.001
There is poor reliability of Böhler's angle and the crucial angle of Gissane in assessing displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures
Abstract
Background: Two-dimensional measurements are used to describe displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACF). Our study evaluates the performance of Böhler's angle (BA) and the crucial angle of Gissane (CAG) among orthopedic surgeons.
Methods: Thirty-four pre- and post-operative lateral foot radiographs from patients with DIACF were shown to four orthopedic surgeons who measured BA and the CAG. The intra- and inter-observer reliability were calculated using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Additionally, we calculated frequency of consensus given an allowed discrepancy. We then determined the tolerance limit for each measurement.
Results: The ICC for inter-observer reliability of BA was 0.83 in the first session and 0.77 in the second. The ICC for intra-observer reliability ranged from 0.83 to 0.98. For the CAG, the inter-observer ICC was 0.28 and 0.1 in the two sessions. Intra-observer ICC ranged from 0.16 to 0.67. With an allowed discrepancy of 20°, there was lack of consensus for BA in 37.5% and for the CAG in 59% of measurements on average. The 95% confidence interval for 90% agreement in BA involved a range of 76°. For CAG, the 95% confidence interval of tolerance for 90% agreement was 56°.
Conclusions: For BA and CAG, there is frequent disagreement among experienced observers, even given a wide tolerance range. We recommend use of caution when applying BA as currently measured in making treatment decisions for DIACF.
Level of clinical evidence: Diagnostic, level III.
Copyright © 2015 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
