Critical Appraisal and Review of Management Strategies for Severe Fibrosis During Penile Implant Surgery
- PMID: 26565574
- DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12985
Critical Appraisal and Review of Management Strategies for Severe Fibrosis During Penile Implant Surgery
Abstract
Introduction: Penile corporal fibrosis represents a challenging clinical scenario for surgeons placing penile prostheses (PP). Because of its rarity, a small number of series with limited follow-up have reported outcomes in this cohort.
Aim: The aim of this study was to perform a critical appraisal of the corporal excavation technique, discuss its relevance to contemporary practice, and review alternative surgical methods and outcomes.
Methods: A critical review was performed of the 2006 article by Montague and Angermeier, "Corporeal excavation: new technique for penile prosthesis implantation in men with severe corporeal fibrosis." Notable inclusions and omissions were described, with emphasis placed on methodology and outcomes. A PubMed search from 1990 to June 2015 was then performed to review and summarize the literature on managing corporal fibrosis during PP surgery.
Main outcome measures: The main outcome measures used were the major contributions and limitations of the 2006 article describing outcomes of the corporal excavation technique.
Results: Corporal excavation is a relevant surgical technique for managing severe corporal fibrosis. Compared with alternatives, excavation achieves successful placement of PP without need for grafting and with few complications. The article was limited by several notable omissions including relevant patient demographic and disease characteristics, patient selection, and minimal descriptions of complications and outcomes. Alternative techniques include use of specialized dilators, counter incisions, reconstruction with graft placement, minimal scar tissue excision, and endoscopic resection. Because of limited data, no specific algorithm for managing corporal fibrosis can be prescribed.
Conclusions: Corporal fibrosis is a challenging clinical scenario and requires surgical experience and specialized techniques to manage appropriately. Corporal excavation represents one of several viable techniques, which may be chosen based on surgeon's preference and clinical factors.
Keywords: Erectile Dysfunction; Peyronie's Disease; Revision; Salvage.
© 2015 International Society for Sexual Medicine.
Comment in
-
Editorial Comment on "Critical Appraisal and Review of Management Strategies for Severe Fibrosis During Penile Implant Surgery".J Sex Med. 2015 Nov;12 Suppl 7:448. doi: 10.1111/jsm.13003. J Sex Med. 2015. PMID: 26565575 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Multicenter surgical outcomes of penile prosthesis placement in patients with corporal fibrosis and review of the literature.Int J Impot Res. 2022 Jan;34(1):86-92. doi: 10.1038/s41443-020-00373-9. Epub 2020 Nov 17. Int J Impot Res. 2022. PMID: 33204006 Review.
-
Penile prosthesis surgery in patients with corporal fibrosis: a state of the art review.J Sex Med. 2011 Jul;8(7):1880-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02281.x. Epub 2011 Apr 14. J Sex Med. 2011. PMID: 21492405 Review.
-
Successful Placement of Penile Prostheses in Men With Severe Corporal Fibrosis Following Vacuum Therapy Protocol.J Sex Med. 2017 Jan;14(1):44-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.11.304. Epub 2016 Dec 6. J Sex Med. 2017. PMID: 27938991
-
Editorial Comment on "Critical Appraisal and Review of Management Strategies for Severe Fibrosis During Penile Implant Surgery".J Sex Med. 2015 Nov;12 Suppl 7:448. doi: 10.1111/jsm.13003. J Sex Med. 2015. PMID: 26565575 No abstract available.
-
Upsizing of inflatable penile implant cylinders in patients with corporal fibrosis.J Sex Med. 2006 Jul;3(4):736-742. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00263.x. J Sex Med. 2006. PMID: 16839331
Cited by
-
Damage Control Considerations During IPP Surgery.Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Jan 30;20(2):10. doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0872-x. Curr Urol Rep. 2019. PMID: 30701330 Review.
-
Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Insertion in Men with Severe Intracorporal Fibrosis.Curr Urol. 2017 Jul;10(2):92-96. doi: 10.1159/000447158. Epub 2017 May 30. Curr Urol. 2017. PMID: 28785194 Free PMC article.
-
Multicenter surgical outcomes of penile prosthesis placement in patients with corporal fibrosis and review of the literature.Int J Impot Res. 2022 Jan;34(1):86-92. doi: 10.1038/s41443-020-00373-9. Epub 2020 Nov 17. Int J Impot Res. 2022. PMID: 33204006 Review.
-
Penile prosthesis implant in the special populations: diabetics, neurogenic conditions, fibrotic cases, concurrent urinary continence surgery, and salvage implants.Asian J Androl. 2020 Jan-Feb;22(1):39-44. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_127_19. Asian J Androl. 2020. PMID: 31793445 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The International Penile Prosthesis Implant Consensus Forum: clinical recommendations and surgical principles on the inflatable 3-piece penile prosthesis implant.Nat Rev Urol. 2022 Sep;19(9):534-546. doi: 10.1038/s41585-022-00607-z. Epub 2022 Jun 16. Nat Rev Urol. 2022. PMID: 35711059 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous