Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan;70(1):56-65.
doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12747. Epub 2015 Nov 13.

How much is too much? Outcomes in patients using high-dose insulin glargine

Affiliations

How much is too much? Outcomes in patients using high-dose insulin glargine

T Reid et al. Int J Clin Pract. 2016 Jan.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) do not achieve glycaemic control targets on basal insulin regimens. This analysis investigated characteristics, clinical outcomes and impact of concomitant oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) in patients with T2DM treated with high-dose insulin glargine.

Methods: Patient-level data were pooled from 15 randomised, treat-to-target trials in patients with T2DM treated with insulin glargine ± OADs for ≥ 24 weeks. Data were stratified according to whether patients exceeded three insulin dose cut-off levels (> 0.5, > 0.7 and > 1.0 IU/kg). End-points included glycated haemoglobin A1c (A1C), fasting plasma glucose, body weight, and overall, nocturnal and severe hypoglycaemia.

Results: Data from 2837 insulin-naïve patients were analysed. Patients with insulin titrated beyond the three doses investigated had significantly higher baseline A1C levels and were younger, with shorter diabetes duration than those at/below cut-offs (p < 0.05 for all cut-offs); they also had greater weight gain (p < 0.001 for the > 0.5 and > 0.7 IU/kg cut-offs) than those who did not exceed the cut-offs, regardless of concomitant OAD. Patients on concomitant metformin alone had higher insulin doses at Week 24, but achieved greater reductions in A1C, less weight gain and lower hypoglycaemia rates than patients on a concomitant sulfonylurea or metformin plus a sulfonylurea, regardless of whether cut-offs were exceeded.

Conclusion: In patients with T2DM, increasing basal insulin doses above 0.5 IU/kg may not improve glycaemic control; treatment strategies targeting postprandial glucose control should be considered for such patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Adjusted mean A1C change from baseline to Week 24 in (A) the overall population, (B) patients with concomitant metformin use, (C) patients with concomitant sulfonylurea use and (D) patients with concomitant metformin plus sulfonylurea use. A1C, glycated haemoglobin A1c. All values represent the mean (SE)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Adjusted mean FPG at Week 24 in (A) the overall population, (B) patients with concomitant metformin use, (C) patients with concomitant sulfonylurea use and (D) patients with concomitant metformin plus sulfonylurea use. FPG, fasting plasma glucose. All values represent the mean (SE)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Adjusted mean weight change from baseline to Week 24 in (A) overall population, (B) patients with concomitant metformin use, (C) patients with concomitant sulfonylurea use and (D) patients with concomitant metformin plus sulfonylurea use
Figure 4
Figure 4
Adjusted mean hypoglycaemia event rates prior to and after exceeding dose cut‐offs, with hypoglycaemia defined as: PG < 70 mg/dl (A); PG < 56 mg/dl (B); and severe hypoglycaemia (C). PG, plasma glucose. All values represent the mean (SE)

References

    1. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient‐centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2015; 38: 140–9. - PubMed
    1. Garber AJ, Abrahamson MJ, Barzilay JI et al. AACE comprehensive diabetes management algorithm 2013. Endocr Pract 2013; 19: 327–36. - PubMed
    1. Stark Casagrande S, Fradkin JE, Saydah SH et al. The prevalence of meeting A1C, blood pressure, and LDL goals among people with diabetes, 1988‐2010. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 2271–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mata‐Cases M, Benito‐Badorrey B, Roura‐Olmeda P et al. Clinical inertia in the treatment of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes patients in primary care. Curr Med Res Opin 2013; 29: 1495–502. - PubMed
    1. Reach G. Clinical inertia, uncertainty and individualized guidelines. Diabetes Metab 2014; 40: 241–5. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms