Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar;25(3):507-16.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1170-9. Epub 2015 Nov 13.

Advantages and psychometric validation of proximal intensive assessments of patient-reported outcomes collected in daily life

Eve B Carlson  1 , Nigel P Field  2 , Josef I Ruzek  3 , Richard A Bryant  4 , Constance J Dalenberg  5 , Terrence M Keane  6   7 , David A Spain  8
Affiliations

Advantages and psychometric validation of proximal intensive assessments of patient-reported outcomes collected in daily life

Eve B Carlson et al. Qual Life Res. 2016 Mar.

Erratum in

Abstract

Objectives: Ambulatory assessment data collection methods are increasingly used to study behavior, experiences, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as emotions, cognitions, and symptoms in clinical samples. Data collected close in time at frequent and fixed intervals can assess PROs that are discrete or changing rapidly and provide information about temporal dynamics or mechanisms of change in clinical samples and individuals, but clinical researchers have not yet routinely and systematically investigated the reliability and validity of such measures or their potential added value over conventional measures. The present study provides a comprehensive, systematic evaluation of the psychometrics of several proximal intensive assessment (PIA) measures in a clinical sample and investigates whether PIA appears to assess meaningful differences in phenomena over time.

Methods: Data were collected on a variety of psychopathology constructs on handheld devices every 4 h for 7 days from 62 adults recently exposed to traumatic injury of themselves or a family member. Data were also collected on standard self-report measures of the same constructs at the time of enrollment, 1 week after enrollment, and 2 months after injury.

Results: For all measure scores, results showed good internal consistency across items and within persons over time, provided evidence of convergent, divergent, and construct validity, and showed significant between- and within-subject variability.

Conclusions: Results indicate that PIA measures can provide valid measurement of psychopathology in a clinical sample. PIA may be useful to study mechanisms of change in clinical contexts, identify targets for change, and gauge treatment progress.

Keywords: Ambulatory assessment; Ecological momentary assessment; Experience sampling method; Intensive longitudinal data; Patient-reported outcomes; Traumatic stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Sample Signal Patterns and Reporting Period for Proximal, Fixed-Interval, Retrospective and Experience Sampling Method Data Collection Methods
Schematic chart showing the time and reporting periods for the Proximal Intensive Assessment and Experience Sampling Method data collection methods. The P and E arrows delineate the periods of time that are reported on for each assessment period.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Enrollment and retention flowchart.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Schwarz N. Why researchers should think “real-time”: A cognitive rationale. In: Mehl MR, Conner TS, editors. Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York: Guilford Press; 2012. pp. 22–42.
    1. Reis HT, Gable SL. Event-sampling and other methods for studying everyday experience. In: Reis HT, Judd CM, editors. Handbook of research methods for social and personality psychology. New York: Wiley; 2000. pp. 190–222.
    1. Nezlek JB. Diary methods for personality and social psychology. Los Angeles: Sage; 2012.
    1. Myin-Germeys I, Oorschot M, Collip D, Lataster J, Delespaul P, van Os J. Experience sampling research in psychopathology: opening the black box of daily life. Psychological Medicine. 2009;39(9):1533–1547. - PubMed
    1. Shrout PE, Lane SP. Psychometrics. In: Mehl MR, Conner TS, editors. Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York: Guilford; 2012. pp. 302–320.

Publication types