Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov 14:4:e11352.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.11352.

Sexually divergent expression of active and passive conditioned fear responses in rats

Affiliations

Sexually divergent expression of active and passive conditioned fear responses in rats

Tina M Gruene et al. Elife. .

Abstract

Traditional rodent models of Pavlovian fear conditioning assess the strength of learning by quantifying freezing responses. However, sole reliance on this measure includes the de facto assumption that any locomotor activity reflects an absence of fear. Consequently, alternative expressions of associative learning are rarely considered. Here we identify a novel, active fear response ('darting') that occurs primarily in female rats. In females, darting exhibits the characteristics of a learned fear behavior, appearing during the CS period as conditioning proceeds and disappearing from the CS period during extinction. This finding motivates a reinterpretation of rodent fear conditioning studies, particularly in females, and it suggests that conditioned fear behavior is more diverse than previously appreciated. Moreover, rats that darted during initial fear conditioning exhibited lower freezing during the second day of extinction testing, suggesting that females employ distinct and adaptive fear response strategies that improve long-term outcomes.

Keywords: active responses; fear conditioning; neuroscience; rat; sex differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Darting is an active learned response to the CS that occurs primarily in female rats.
(a) Experimental timeline. (b) Darts were characterized by a brief, high velocity movement across the test chamber. (c) Velocity traces from a representative animal, demonstrating increase in conditioned darting events across fear conditioning trials. Asterisks denote events that reached criterion for darting during the CS. Time 0 denotes CS onset. (d) Temporal organization of darting in all female rats. On the left is a two dimensional histogram of dart timing relative to the CS averaged over all females for 5 habituation trials and 7 conditioning trials on day 1. Trial time is on the x-axis and colored bars denote the trial epochs we defined as CS (green), shock response (orange), and post shock response (blue). Each row represents a CS trial (habituation 1–5, and conditioning 6–12), and depicts average dart rate by the color in each 4-second bin according to the color bar. On the right are histograms of the temporal organization of darts averaged over the five habituation trials (top) and the last three conditioning trials (bottom). Darts were detected and counted as described in Materials and methods. (e) Temporal organization of darting in all male rats. Panels are organized as in (d). During habituation trials, darts occurred at low rates throughout the trial in both sexes. In contrast, after conditioning only females exhibited increased darting triggered by tone onset (‘CS’) and sustained darting after shock delivery (‘Post-shock’). Both sexes darted in response to the shock itself (Shock response). In both sexes, the first bin after the shock exceeds the limits of the y-axis. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11352.003
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Sex differences in darting responses during fear conditioning and extinction.
(a) The 4 fear conditioning epochs in which velocity was recorded. Graphs in c-f and i-j are color coded to match, and represent mean +/- SEM. (b) In graphs c-f and i-j, females are represented by filled circle, males by an open square. (c) Pre-CS (final 60 sec before 1st CS presentation) and CS dart rate (darts/min) during conditioning. (d) number of darts observed during 5s shock (US) response periods. (e) maximum velocity reached during 5s shock (US) response periods. (f) mean dart rate observed during 30s post-shock period. (g) and (h) Pearson’s correlations of mean shock response velocity and total session dart count [note that visible male outlier was removed from analysis for being 6 SDs above mean total dart count. When included, r=0.34, p<0.05]. (i) Pre-CS and CS dart rate (darts/min) during Extinction. (j) Pre-CS and CS dart rate (darts/min) during Extinction testing. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; *** p<0.001; ****p<0.0001 males vs. females. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11352.005
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Darting subpopulations are greater in females and exhibit distinct behavioral patterns.
(a) and (f) proportion of females and males that qualified as Darters. (b) max velocity reached during shock response period (c) mean dart rate (darts/min) observed during 30s post-shock period. (d) Pre-CS and CS dart rate (darts/min) during conditioning, extinction, and extinction test. (e) CS freezing in female Darters vs. Non-darters. (g) Shock response velocity did not differ between male Darters and Non-darters. (h) mean dart rate (darts/min) observed during 30s post-shock period. (i) Pre-CS and CS dart rate (darts/min) during conditioning, extinction, and extinction test. (j) CS freezing in male Darters vs. Non-darters. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; *** p<0.001; ****p<0.0001 Darters vs. Non-darters DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11352.006
Figure 3—figure supplement 1.
Figure 3—figure supplement 1.. Distribution of animals in each estrous cycle phase did not differ between Darters and Non-darters.
Chi square = 2.785, p=0.42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11352.007
Author response image 1.
Author response image 1.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11352.009
Author response image 2.
Author response image 2.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11352.010
Author response image 3.
Author response image 3.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11352.011

Comment in

References

    1. Archer J. Rodent sex differences in emotional and related behavior. Behavioral Biology. 1975;14:451–479. doi: 10.1016/S0091-6773(75)90636-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blanchard RJ, Blanchard DC. Passive and active reactions to fear-eliciting stimuli. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 1969;68:129–135. doi: 10.1037/h0027676. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dalla C, Shors TJ. Sex differences in learning processes of classical and operant conditioning. Physiology & Behavior. 2009;97:229–238. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.02.035. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fanselow MS. Conditioned and unconditional components of post-shock freezing. The Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science. 1980;15:177–182. - PubMed
    1. Fernandes C, González MI, Wilson CA, File SE. Factor analysis shows that female rat behaviour is characterized primarily by activity, male rats are driven by sex and anxiety. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 1999;64:731–736. doi: 10.1016/S0091-3057(99)00139-2. - DOI - PubMed