Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Feb;40(2):225-31.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3049-3. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

Barbed sutures in total hip and knee arthroplasty: what is the evidence? A meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Barbed sutures in total hip and knee arthroplasty: what is the evidence? A meta-analysis

Robert W Borzio et al. Int Orthop. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Newer methods of wound closure such as bidirectional barbed sutures hold the potential to reduce closure time and thus overall operating room costs during total joint arthroplasty (TJA), including total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, it is unclear whether these sutures have similar clinical outcomes or whether they place the patient at risk of developing wound complications that may outweigh the time-saving benefits of these sutures.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify all level I trials that reported the use of barbed suture during TJA. We analyzed the efficacy, safety, major and minor complications, and overall cost related to barbed sutures.

Results: Four studies met our criteria, and included 588 patients who were randomized either to barbed suture closure (n = 290 TJAs, 268 TKAs, and 22 THAs) or to a matched conventional suture cohort (n = 298 TJAs, 279 TKAs, and 19 THA). In terms of time savings with wound closure, the barbed suture was 6.3 minutes faster than the conventional cohort (p < 0.05). The odds for developing a minor complication were nearly identical (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, p = 0.95) and for major complication was not significantly different (OR 2.94, p = 0.27). The overall mean savings including both THA and TKA was USD 298 per case.

Conclusions: In randomized controlled trials, barbed sutures are consistently associated with shorter wound closure time, which also corresponds to cost savings, even when the higher cost of these sutures is taken into account. There was no significant difference in the odds of experiencing either minor or major complications between patients in whom barbed sutures versus standard sutures were used for wound closure. Current evidence supports continued use of these sutures.

Level of evidence: Level I.

Keywords: Barbed sutures; Meta analysis; Total hip arthroplasty; Total knee arthroplasty; Wound closure.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Arthroplasty. 2014 May;29(5):966-9 - PubMed
    1. Aesthet Surg J. 2014 Feb;34(2):272-83 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 16;96(8):624-30 - PubMed
    1. J Knee Surg. 2010 Sep;23(3):163-7 - PubMed
    1. J Knee Surg. 2015 Apr;28(2):151-6 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources