Pan Canadian Rash Trial: A Randomized Phase III Trial Evaluating the Impact of a Prophylactic Skin Treatment Regimen on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Induced Skin Toxicities in Patients With Metastatic Lung Cancer
- PMID: 26573073
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.3918
Pan Canadian Rash Trial: A Randomized Phase III Trial Evaluating the Impact of a Prophylactic Skin Treatment Regimen on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Induced Skin Toxicities in Patients With Metastatic Lung Cancer
Abstract
Purpose: Erlotinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor approved for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose epidermal growth factor receptor expression status is positive or unknown. Although it is efficacious, erlotinib can cause skin toxicity. This prospective, randomized phase III trial examined the effect of prophylactic treatment of erlotinib-induced skin rash.
Patients and methods: Patients receiving erlotinib in the second- or third-line setting for advanced NSCLC were randomly assigned to prophylactic minocycline (100 mg twice per day for 4 weeks), reactive treatment (after rash developed, per grade of rash), or no treatment unless severe (grade 3). Rash incidence and severity, time to maximal rash, time to resolution, and overall survival (OS) were compared among treatment groups.
Results: In all, 150 patients were randomly assigned, 50 to each of three treatment arms. The incidence of skin toxicity was 84% regardless of treatment arm. Prophylactic treatment with minocycline significantly lengthened the time to the most severe grade of rash. Grade 3 rash was significantly higher in the no-treatment arm. OS was not significantly different among treatment arms, but patients receiving prophylactic or reactive treatments had a longer OS (7.6 and 8 months, respectively) than those who received no rash treatment (6 months). Rash was not self-limiting.
Conclusion: The incidence of all grades of rash did not differ statistically among the three arms, so the trial was negative. The incidence of grade 3 skin toxicities was reduced in patients who were treated with prophylactic minocycline or reactive treatment. Efficacy was not compromised. Prophylactic minocycline and reactive treatment are both acceptable options for the necessary treatment of erlotinib-induced rash in the second- or third-line setting of metastatic NSCLC.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00473083.
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Comment in
-
Pre-Emptive or Reactive Treatment of Cutaneous Rash Induced by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors: Does It Matter?J Clin Oncol. 2016 Mar 10;34(8):774-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.7529. Epub 2015 Dec 28. J Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26712233 No abstract available.
-
Preventing or treating anti-EGFR related skin rash with antibiotics?Ann Transl Med. 2016 Aug;4(16):312. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.07.01. Ann Transl Med. 2016. PMID: 27668232 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Skin communicates what we deeply feel: antibiotic prophylactic treatment to reduce epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors induced rash in lung cancer (the Pan Canadian rash trial).Ann Transl Med. 2016 Aug;4(16):313. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.08.19. Ann Transl Med. 2016. PMID: 27668233 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Treatment strategies of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor-induced skin toxicities: pre-emptive or reactive?Ann Transl Med. 2016 Aug;4(16):318. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.08.03. Ann Transl Med. 2016. PMID: 27668238 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
