Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun;19(8):1358-67.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980015003055. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

A critical examination of the available data sources for estimating meat and protein consumption in the USA

Affiliations

A critical examination of the available data sources for estimating meat and protein consumption in the USA

Keri Szejda Fehrenbach et al. Public Health Nutr. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To describe the methods, strengths and limitations of available data sources for estimating US meat and protein consumption in order to facilitate accurate interpretations and applications.

Design: We examined agricultural supply and dietary intake databases from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), the US Department of Health and Human Services and the FAO to describe their methodology and to report the most recent estimates for meat and protein consumption.

Results: Together, loss-adjusted agricultural supply data and dietary recall data provide the best available estimates of US consumption; the most recent sources indicated that US citizens (ages 2 years and over) consume 4·4-5·9 oz (125·9-166·5 g) of total meat and 6·2-7·4 oz-eq (175·2-209·4 g-eq) from the USDA Protein Foods Group per day. Meat constitutes the majority of intake within the Protein Foods Group, and red meat and processed meat constitute the majority of total meat intake. Nutrient supply data indicate that total meat represents an estimated 43·1 % of the total protein available in the US food supply, but without any loss-adjusted nutrient data, per capita protein intake is best estimated by dietary recall data to be 79·9 g/d.

Conclusions: In order to address public health concerns related to excess meat and/or protein consumption, practitioners, educators and researchers must appropriately use available data sources in order to accurately report consumption at the population level. Implications for comparing these estimates with various recommended intakes are discussed.

Keywords: Consumption; Dietary guidelines; FAO; Food availability; Meat; National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; Production; Protein; US Department of Agriculture.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Pan A, Sun Q, Bernstein AM et al.. (2012) Red meat consumption and mortality: results from 2 prospective cohort studies. Arch Intern Med 172, 555–563. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sinha R, Cross AJ, Graubard BI et al.. (2009) Meat intake and mortality: a prospective study of over half a million people. Arch Intern Med 169, 562–571. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaluza J, Wolk A & Larsson SC (2012) Red meat consumption and risk of stroke: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Stroke 43, 2556–2560. - PubMed
    1. Pan A, Sun Q, Bernstein AM et al.. (2011) Red meat consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: 3 cohorts of US adults and an updated meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 94, 1088–1096. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Micha R, Wallace SK & Mozaffarian D (2010) Red and processed meat consumption and risk of incident coronary heart disease, stroke, and diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation 121, 2271–2283. - PMC - PubMed