Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May;70(5):520-5.
doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-205952. Epub 2015 Nov 16.

Six steps in quality intervention development (6SQuID)

Affiliations

Six steps in quality intervention development (6SQuID)

Daniel Wight et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 May.

Abstract

Improving the effectiveness of public health interventions relies as much on the attention paid to their design and feasibility as to their evaluation. Yet, compared to the vast literature on how to evaluate interventions, there is little to guide researchers or practitioners on how best to develop such interventions in practical, logical, evidence based ways to maximise likely effectiveness. Existing models for the development of public health interventions tend to have a strong social-psychological, individual behaviour change orientation and some take years to implement. This paper presents a pragmatic guide to six essential Steps for Quality Intervention Development (6SQuID). The focus is on public health interventions but the model should have wider applicability. Once a problem has been identified as needing intervention, the process of designing an intervention can be broken down into six crucial steps: (1) defining and understanding the problem and its causes; (2) identifying which causal or contextual factors are modifiable: which have the greatest scope for change and who would benefit most; (3) deciding on the mechanisms of change; (4) clarifying how these will be delivered; (5) testing and adapting the intervention; and (6) collecting sufficient evidence of effectiveness to proceed to a rigorous evaluation. If each of these steps is carefully addressed, better use will be made of scarce public resources by avoiding the costly evaluation, or implementation, of unpromising interventions.

Keywords: GENDER; HEALTH PROMOTION; PREVENTION; PUBLIC HEALTH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Causal pathways perpetuating gender-based violence.

References

    1. Speller V, Learmonth A, Harrison D. The search for evidence of effective health promotion. BMJ 1997;315:361–3. 10.1136/bmj.315.7104.361 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pawson T, Tilley N.. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage, 1997.
    1. MRC. A framework for the development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. London: Medical Research Council, 2000.
    1. MRC. Development and evaluation of complex interventions: new guidance. London: Medical Research Council, 2008.
    1. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalised causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co, 2002.

Publication types

MeSH terms