Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 15;22(8):1969-77.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2042. Epub 2015 Nov 16.

The Immune Checkpoint Regulator PD-L1 Is Highly Expressed in Aggressive Primary Prostate Cancer

Affiliations

The Immune Checkpoint Regulator PD-L1 Is Highly Expressed in Aggressive Primary Prostate Cancer

Heidrun Gevensleben et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: Therapies targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway promote anti-tumor immunity and have shown promising results in various tumors. Preliminary data further indicate that immunohistochemically detected PD-L1 may be predictive for anti-PD-1 therapy. So far, no data are available on PD-L1 expression in primary prostate cancer.

Experimental design: Following validation of a monoclonal antibody, immunohistochemical analysis of PD-L1 expression was performed in two independent, well-characterized cohorts of primary prostate cancer patients following radical prostatectomy (RP), and resulting data were correlated to clinicopathological parameters and outcome.

Results: In the training cohort (n= 209), 52.2% of cases expressed moderate to high PD-L1 levels, which positively correlated with proliferation (Ki-67,P< 0.001), Gleason score (P= 0.004), and androgen receptor (AR) expression (P< 0.001). Furthermore, PD-L1 positivity was prognostic for biochemical recurrence [BCR;P= 0.004; HR, 2.37; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.32-4.25]. In the test cohort (n= 611), moderate to high PD-L1 expression was detected in 61.7% and remained prognostic for BCR in univariate Cox analysis (P= 0.011; HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.10-2.02). The correlation of Ki-67 and AR with PD-L1 expression was confirmed in the test cohort (P< 0.001). In multivariate Cox analysis of all patients, PD-L1 was corroborated as independently prognostic for BCR (P= 0.007; HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.11-1.92).

Conclusions: We provide first evidence that expression of the therapy target PD-L1 is not only highly prevalent in primary prostate cancer cells but is also an independent indicator of BCR, suggesting a biologic relevance in primary tumors. Further studies need to ascertain if PD-1/PD-L1-targeted therapy might be a treatment option for hormone-naïve prostate cancers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

MeSH terms