ALS biomarkers for therapy development: State of the field and future directions
- PMID: 26574709
- PMCID: PMC4718795
- DOI: 10.1002/mus.24979
ALS biomarkers for therapy development: State of the field and future directions
Abstract
Biomarkers have become the focus of intense research in the field of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), with the hope that they might aid therapy development efforts. Notwithstanding the discovery of many candidate biomarkers, none have yet emerged as validated tools for drug development. In this review we present a nuanced view of biomarkers based on the perspective of the Food and Drug Administration; highlight the distinction between discovery and validation; describe existing and emerging resources; review leading biological fluid-based, electrophysiological, and neuroimaging candidates relevant to therapy development efforts; discuss lessons learned from biomarker initiatives in related neurodegenerative diseases; and outline specific steps that we, as a field, might take to hasten the development and validation of biomarkers that will prove useful in enhancing efforts to develop effective treatments for ALS patients. Most important among these is the proposal to establish a federated ALS Biomarker Consortium in which all interested and willing stakeholders may participate with equal opportunity to contribute to the broader mission of biomarker development and validation.
Keywords: ALS; biomarkers; disease progression; pharmacodynamic; predictive; prognostic.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Andreas Jeromin is a paid employee and shareholder of Iron Horse Diagnostics, Inc. Seward Rutkove owns equity, receives consulting fees, and owns patent rights in Skulpt Inc.
Nazem Atassi receives consulting fees from Biogen.
James D. Berry has consulted with Biogen Idec and Neuraltus Pharmaceuticals and has received research support from Voyager Therapeutics, GSK, Cytokinetics, Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics, Novartis, ALS Therapy Development Institute, ALS Association, MDA, and NIH.
References
-
- Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2001;69:89–95. - PubMed
-
- US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Qualification Process for Drug Development Tools. 2014.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
