Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov 10:4:688.
doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1449-x. eCollection 2015.

Prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis of peritoneal metastasis from breast cancer

Affiliations

Prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis of peritoneal metastasis from breast cancer

Serena Bertozzi et al. Springerplus. .

Abstract

Peritoneal metastasis from breast cancer is a serious and deadly condition only limited considered in the literature. Our aim was to study prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis of breast cancer peritoneal metastasis. We retrospectively analyzed 3096 women with a diagnosis of invasive breast cancer. We took into consideration presence and localization of breast cancer distant metastasis as well as the possible risk factors and survival from the diagnosis of the breast cancer metastasis. The prevalence of breast cancer peritoneal metastases was 0.7 % (22/3096), representing the 7.6 % (22/289) of women affected by distant metastases. Moreover, independent risk factors for breast cancer peritoneal metastases resulted high grading, lobular invasive histology, and advanced T and N stage at diagnosis. Overall survival after metastasis diagnosis was shorter in women affected by peritoneal metastases or brain metastases in comparison to other metastatic women. Breast cancer peritoneal metastases were uncommon but not rare events with a poor prognosis after standard treatments.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Distant metastasis, peritoneal metastasis; Overall survival; Peritoneal carcinomatosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Cumulative distant metastases appearance during the follow-up and TNM stage at diagnosis, b 2 years overall survival after the appearance of distant metastases. The difference between women affected by pertitoneal carcinomatosis (M1—peritoneum) and other metastases (excluding brain) was statistically significant (p < 0.05) as well as the difference between women affected by brain metastases and women affected by other metastases (p < 0.05). c Two years overall survival after the appearance of peritoneal carcinomatosis (M1—peritoneum) in our population and in cases referred by the literature to be treated by HIPEC procedure (Cardi et al. ; Garofalo et al. 2006). We found a significant longer survival in patients treated by HIPEC procedure (p < 0.05)

References

    1. Altekruse S, Kosary C, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, Ruhl J, Howlader N, Tatalovich Z, Cho H, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2007. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2010.
    1. Arnone P, Zurrida S, Viale G, Dellapasqua S, Montagna E, Arnaboldi P, Intra M, Veronesi U. The TNM classification of breast cancer: need for change. Updates Surg. 2010;62(2):75–81. doi: 10.1007/s13304-010-0014-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ayhan A, Guvenal T, Salman MC, Ozyuncu O, Sakinci M, Basaran M. The role of cytoreductive surgery in nongenital cancers metastatic to the ovaries. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;98(2):235–241. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.05.028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bernardi S, Bertozzi S, Londero AP, Gentile G, Giacomuzzi F, Carbone A. Incidence and risk factors of the intraoperative localization failure of nonpalpable breast lesions by radio-guided occult lesion localization: A retrospective analysis of 579 cases. World J Surg. 2012;36(8):1915–1921. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1577-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bernardi S, Bertozzi S, Londero AP, Giacomuzzi F, Angione V, Dri C, Carbone A, Petri R. 9 years of experience with the sentinel lymph node biopsy in a single Italian center: A retrospective analysis of 1050 cases. World J Surg. 2012;36(4):714–722. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1420-0. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources