Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;5(1):40.
doi: 10.1186/s13613-015-0083-7. Epub 2015 Nov 14.

Automatic versus manual changeovers of norepinephrine infusion pumps in critically ill adults: a prospective controlled study

Affiliations

Automatic versus manual changeovers of norepinephrine infusion pumps in critically ill adults: a prospective controlled study

Emilie Greau et al. Ann Intensive Care. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Norepinephrine is a key drug for treating shock but has a short half-life that requires continuous intravenous administration to maintain the constant plasma concentration needed to obtain a stable blood pressure. The small volume of the syringes used in power infusion pumps requires frequent changeovers, which can lead to norepinephrine flow interruptions responsible for hemodynamic instability. Changeovers from the nearly empty to the full syringe can be performed manually using the quick change technique (QC) or automatically using smart infusion pumps (SIP) that link two syringes. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the hypothesis that, compared to QC, SIP for norepinephrine changeovers was associated with less hemodynamic instability.

Methods: After information of the patient or next of kin, patients receiving norepinephrine for shock were allocated to QC or SIP changeovers. QC changeovers were performed by a nurse, who started a new loaded pump when the previous syringe was nearly empty. SIP changeovers were managed automatically by SIP workstations. The primary outcome was the proportion of changeovers followed by a ≥20 % drop in mean arterial pressure (MAP).

Results: 411 changeovers were performed, 193 in the 18 patients allocated to QC and 218 in the 32 patients allocated to SIP. Baseline patient characteristics were similar in both groups. The proportion of changeovers followed by an MAP drop ≥20 % was 12.4 % (24/193) with QC and 5.5 % (12/218) with SIP (P = 0.01). By multivariate analysis, two factors were independently associated with a significantly decreased risk of ≥20 % MAP drops during changeovers, namely, SIP (odds ratio, 0.47; 95 % confidence interval, 0.22-0.98) and norepinephrine dosage >0.5 μg/kg/min (odds ratio, 0.39; 95 % confidence interval, 0.19-0.81).

Conclusions: The risk of MAP drops ≥20 % during changeovers can be significantly diminished using SIPs instead of the QC method.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrial.gov NCT 01127152.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01127152.

Keywords: Catecholamines; Changeover; Critically ill; Norepinephrine; Shock; Smart infusion pumps.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Infusion line setup. a Multilumen central venous catheter (Arrow, Kingston, UK); b infusion line (BD Medical, Le Pont de Clais, France) connected to the proximal lumen of the central venous catheter; c perfusion ramp with a three-way stopcock (Vygon, Ecouen, France); d anti-reflux valve (Arrow, Kington, UK); e infusion rate control (CAIR LGL, Lissieu, France); f infusion pump; g Dextrose 5 % infusion set (B. Braun, Boulogne Billancourt, France)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flowchart
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
MAP variations before, during, and after norepinephrine changeovers. MAP mean arterial pressure, QC quick change, SIP smart infusion pump. Variations in mean values of MAP from 15 min before to 15 min after changeovers in both groups. T0 was just before changeover initiation

References

    1. Bougle A, Harrois A, Duranteau J. Resuscitative strategies in traumatic hemorrhagic shock. Ann Intensive Care. 2013;3(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-3-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(2):165–228. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levy B, Bastien O, Benjelid K, Cariou A, Chouihed T, Combes A, et al. Experts’ recommendations for the management of adult patients with cardiogenic shock. Ann Intensive Care. 2015;5(1):52. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hollenberg SM. Vasoactive drugs in circulatory shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(7):847–855. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201006-0972CI. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Monnet X, Lefrant JY, Teboul JL. Field 6. Safety practices for haemodynamic procedures (administration of vasoactive drugs, vascular and cardiac catheterization). French-speaking Society of Intensive Care. French Society of Anesthesia and Resuscitation. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2008;27(10):e91–e99. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2008.09.012. - DOI - PubMed

Associated data