The use of a biological model for comparing two techniques of fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous puncture: A randomised cross-over study
- PMID: 26579251
- PMCID: PMC4442951
- DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2012.12.001
The use of a biological model for comparing two techniques of fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous puncture: A randomised cross-over study
Abstract
Objectives: To develop a new and inexpensive model for training in fluoroscopic puncture into the pelvicalyceal system, and to use this model to compare the learning curve of two fluoroscopic techniques, the 'eye of the needle' (EN) and triangulation techniques.
Materials and methods: For the trial we used a commercial plastic model (a shop-window mannequin) in which a bovine kidney, embedded in sponge with a spatial orientation similar to the human, was inserted into the model. The ureter of the animal kidney was connected to contrast fluid. Ten residents and interns were randomised into two groups; group A started the puncture using the EN technique, each member making five attempts, and then five attempts using the triangulation technique, and group B started with triangulation and then used the EN technique.
Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the techniques for the mean (SD) number of trials to make a correct puncture, at 2.68 (1.00) in the EN technique and 2.86 (1.05) in the triangulation technique, or for the duration of each trial, at 523 (189) s for the EN technique and 578 (175) s for the triangulation technique. The fluoroscopy time was less in the EN technique, at 113.9 (48.9) s than for the triangulation method, at 135.8 (42.4) (P < 0.005).
Conclusions: The model was easy to construct and feasible for training. Both techniques had a similar learning curve, with higher fluoroscopy exposure for the triangulation technique.
Keywords: Biological model; EM, eye of the needle (technique); Eye of the needle; PCNL, percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Radical; Triangulation.
Figures





Similar articles
-
A novel biological model for training in percutaneous renal access.Arab J Urol. 2019 Aug 8;17(4):292-297. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1642600. eCollection 2019. Arab J Urol. 2019. PMID: 31723446 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of two different renal access techniques in one-stage percutaneous nephrolithotomy: triangulation versus eye of the needle.Ann Saudi Med. 2018 May-Jun;38(3):189-193. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2018.189. Ann Saudi Med. 2018. PMID: 29848936 Free PMC article.
-
Mini access guide to simplify calyceal access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A novel device.Indian J Urol. 2017 Oct-Dec;33(4):319-322. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_404_16. Indian J Urol. 2017. PMID: 29021658 Free PMC article.
-
Performing easy prone punction.Cent European J Urol. 2017 Jun 30;70(2):170-174. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2017.932. Epub 2017 Jun 7. Cent European J Urol. 2017. PMID: 28721284 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: its advantages and our technique for puncture.Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Dec;7(6):950-959. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.10.04. Transl Androl Urol. 2018. PMID: 30505733 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Outcome of the Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Lateral Position with Guidance of Non-Rotational C-Arm.Res Rep Urol. 2024 Feb 22;16:45-56. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S442145. eCollection 2024. Res Rep Urol. 2024. PMID: 38410528 Free PMC article.
-
A novel biological model for training in percutaneous renal access.Arab J Urol. 2019 Aug 8;17(4):292-297. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1642600. eCollection 2019. Arab J Urol. 2019. PMID: 31723446 Free PMC article.
-
Fresh Frozen Cadavers as a Novel Training Model for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).Res Rep Urol. 2025 May 17;17:167-173. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S515072. eCollection 2025. Res Rep Urol. 2025. PMID: 40401093 Free PMC article.
-
Development and Validation of a Novel Skills Training Model for PCNL, an ESUT project.Acta Biomed. 2022 Aug 31;93(4):e2022254. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i4.11821. Acta Biomed. 2022. PMID: 36043983 Free PMC article.
-
Techniques for fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous renal access: An analytical review.Indian J Urol. 2019 Oct-Dec;35(4):259-266. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_149_19. Indian J Urol. 2019. PMID: 31619863 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Knudsen B.E., Cook A.J., Watterson J.D., Beiko D.T., Nott L., Razvi H. Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy: long-term results from one institution. Urology. 2004;63:230–234. - PubMed
-
- Thompson R.H., Krambeck A.E., Lohse C.M., Elliott D.S., Patterson D.E., Blute M.L. Endoscopic management of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma in patients with normal contralateral kidneys. Urology. 2008;71:713–717. - PubMed
-
- Morris D.S., Taub D.A., Wei J.T., Dunn R.L., Wolf J.S., Jr., Hollenbeck B.K. Regionalization of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: evidence for the increasing burden of care on tertiary centers. J Urol. 2006;176:242–246. - PubMed
-
- Michel M.S., Trojan L., Rassweiler J.J. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51:899–906. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials