Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jun;9(2):93-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2011.06.014. Epub 2011 Sep 13.

Retrograde balloon dilation >10 weeks after renal transplantation for transplant ureter stenosis - our experience and review of the literature

Affiliations

Retrograde balloon dilation >10 weeks after renal transplantation for transplant ureter stenosis - our experience and review of the literature

Robert Rabenalt et al. Arab J Urol. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Despite many efforts to prevent ureteric stenosis in a transplanted kidney, this complication occurs in 3-5% of renal transplant recipients. Balloon dilatation (BD) is a possible minimally invasive approach for treatment, but reports to date refer only to the antegrade approach; we analysed our experience with retrograde BD (RBD) and reviewed previous reports.

Patients and methods: From October 2008 to February 2011, eight patients after renal transplantation (RTX) underwent RBD for transplant ureteric stenosis at our hospital. We retrospectively analysed the outcome and reviewed previous reports.

Results: The eight recipients (five men and three women; median age 55 years, range 38-69) were treated with one or two RBDs for transplant ureteric stenosis. There were no complications. The median (range) time after RTX was 4.5 (2.5-11) months. Long-term success was only achieved in one recipient, while five patients were re-operated on (three with a new implant, two by replacement of transplanted ureter with ileum) after a median (range) of 2.8 (0.7-7.0) months after unsuccessful RBD(s). For two recipients the success remained unclear (one graft loss due to other reasons, one result pending). When the first RBD was unsuccessful there was no improvement with a second.

Conclusion: RBD is technically feasible, but our findings and the review of previous reports on antegrade ureteric dilatation suggest that the success rate is low when the ureter is dilated at ⩾10 weeks after RTX. From our results we cannot recommend RBD for transplant ureteric stenosis at ⩾10 weeks after RTX, while previous reports show favourable results of antegrade BD in the initial 3 months after RTX.

Keywords: (R)BD, (retrograde) balloon dilatation; Balloon dilatation; PNS, percutaneous nephrostomy; RTX, renal transplantation; Renal transplantation; Ureteric stricture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Retrograde balloon dilation. Stenosis of the distal transplant ureter of a renal transplant with 2 ureters (second ureter not opacified). The right image shows successful dilation with full expansion of the balloon.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Davari H.R., Yarmohammadi H., Malekhosseini S.A., Salahi H., Bahador A., Salehipour M. Urological complications in 980 consecutive patients with renal transplantation. Int J Urol. 2006;13:1271–1275. - PubMed
    1. Emiroglu R., Karakayall H., Sevmis S., Akkoç H., Bilgin N., Haberal M. Urologic complications in 1275 consecutive renal transplantations. Transplant Proc. 2001;33:2016–2017. - PubMed
    1. Karam G., Hétet J.F., Maillet F., Rigaud J., Hourmant M., Soulillou J.P. Late ureteral stenosis following renal transplantation. Risk factors and impact on patient and graft survival. Am J Transplant. 2006;6:352–356. - PubMed
    1. Streeter E.H., Little D.M., Cranston D.W., Morris P.J. The urological complications of renal transplantation: a series of 1535 patients. BJU Int. 2002;90:627–634. - PubMed
    1. Wilson CH, Bhatti AA, Rix DA, Manas DM. Routine intraoperative ureteric stenting for kidney transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;19:CD004925. - PubMed