Laparoscopic management of primary pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction: Single-centre experience
- PMID: 26579305
- PMCID: PMC4150588
- DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2011.10.005
Laparoscopic management of primary pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction: Single-centre experience
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effect and safety of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the treatment of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO).
Patients and methods: In 34 patients, laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty was used to treat primary PUJO. Information was obtained for symptoms, results of a nuclear scan before and after surgery, intraoperative blood loss, operative duration, stenting method, and hospital stay. Under general anaesthesia and in the flank position, a 10 mm trocar was first placed above the umbilicus; three 5 mm working ports were then placed. The ureter and pelvis were freed from surrounding adhesions. The obstructive pelvi-ureteric segment was then excised, and the opened point of the ureter spatulated. Ureteropyeloplasty between the lower pole, pelvis and spatulated ureter was made using a 4-0 polyglactin suture around a JJ stent.
Results: The mean (SD) preoperative nuclear scan result was 23.6 (6.4) mL/min, with retention of tracer. The median operative duration was 200 min, and the median blood loss 120 mL. All patients were stented with a JJ stent. The mean hospital stay was 5 days. The final results were assessed at 6 months after surgery, when the mean (SD) nuclear scan result was 30 (7.4) mL/min.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is a safe and effective option which can produce satisfactory results both clinically and radiologically.
Keywords: Laparoscopy; PUJO, pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction; Pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction; RALP, robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is feasible for lower pole pelvi-ureteric obstruction in duplex systems.Pediatr Surg Int. 2007 Sep;23(9):907-9. doi: 10.1007/s00383-007-1898-6. Pediatr Surg Int. 2007. PMID: 17347838
-
Robotic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: 5-year experience of one centre.BJU Int. 2007 Oct;100(4):880-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07032.x. Epub 2007 May 29. BJU Int. 2007. PMID: 17535275
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for the management of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in horseshoe kidneys: initial experience.J Robot Surg. 2009 Jun;3(2):99-102. doi: 10.1007/s11701-009-0142-x. Epub 2009 Jun 6. J Robot Surg. 2009. PMID: 27638223
-
Contemporary diagnosis and management of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.BJU Int. 2022 Sep;130(3):285-290. doi: 10.1111/bju.15689. Epub 2022 Feb 5. BJU Int. 2022. PMID: 35044033 Review.
-
Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children by polar vessels. Is laparoscopic vascular hitching procedure a good solution? Single center experience on 35 consecutive patients.J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Feb;51(2):310-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Oct 22. J Pediatr Surg. 2016. PMID: 26522896 Review.
References
-
- Pardalidis N.P., Papatsoris A.G., Kosmaoglou E.V. Endoscopic and laparoscopic treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 2002;168:1937–1940. - PubMed
-
- Bauer J.J., Bishoff J.T., Moore R.G., Chen R.N., Iverson A.J., Kavoussi L.R. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty. Assessment of objective and subjective outcome. J Urol. 1999;162:692–695. - PubMed
-
- Albani J.M., Yost A.J., Streem S.B. Uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. Determining durability of endourological intervention. J Urol. 2004;171:579–582. - PubMed
-
- Rehman J., Landman J., Sundaram C., clayman R.V. Missed anterior crossing vessels during open retroperitoneal pyeloplasty: laparoscopic transperitoneal discovery and repair. J Urol. 2001;166:593–596. - PubMed
-
- Tan B.J., Rastinehad A.R., Marcovich R., Smith A.D., Lee B.R. Trends in ureteropelvic junction obstruction management among urologists in the United States. Urology. 2005;65:260–264. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources