Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec;9(4):241-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2011.10.005. Epub 2011 Nov 12.

Laparoscopic management of primary pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction: Single-centre experience

Affiliations

Laparoscopic management of primary pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction: Single-centre experience

Hani Nour et al. Arab J Urol. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect and safety of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the treatment of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO).

Patients and methods: In 34 patients, laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty was used to treat primary PUJO. Information was obtained for symptoms, results of a nuclear scan before and after surgery, intraoperative blood loss, operative duration, stenting method, and hospital stay. Under general anaesthesia and in the flank position, a 10 mm trocar was first placed above the umbilicus; three 5 mm working ports were then placed. The ureter and pelvis were freed from surrounding adhesions. The obstructive pelvi-ureteric segment was then excised, and the opened point of the ureter spatulated. Ureteropyeloplasty between the lower pole, pelvis and spatulated ureter was made using a 4-0 polyglactin suture around a JJ stent.

Results: The mean (SD) preoperative nuclear scan result was 23.6 (6.4) mL/min, with retention of tracer. The median operative duration was 200 min, and the median blood loss 120 mL. All patients were stented with a JJ stent. The mean hospital stay was 5 days. The final results were assessed at 6 months after surgery, when the mean (SD) nuclear scan result was 30 (7.4) mL/min.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is a safe and effective option which can produce satisfactory results both clinically and radiologically.

Keywords: Laparoscopy; PUJO, pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction; Pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction; RALP, robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Pardalidis N.P., Papatsoris A.G., Kosmaoglou E.V. Endoscopic and laparoscopic treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 2002;168:1937–1940. - PubMed
    1. Bauer J.J., Bishoff J.T., Moore R.G., Chen R.N., Iverson A.J., Kavoussi L.R. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty. Assessment of objective and subjective outcome. J Urol. 1999;162:692–695. - PubMed
    1. Albani J.M., Yost A.J., Streem S.B. Uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. Determining durability of endourological intervention. J Urol. 2004;171:579–582. - PubMed
    1. Rehman J., Landman J., Sundaram C., clayman R.V. Missed anterior crossing vessels during open retroperitoneal pyeloplasty: laparoscopic transperitoneal discovery and repair. J Urol. 2001;166:593–596. - PubMed
    1. Tan B.J., Rastinehad A.R., Marcovich R., Smith A.D., Lee B.R. Trends in ureteropelvic junction obstruction management among urologists in the United States. Urology. 2005;65:260–264. - PubMed