Benefit of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion vs Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Lumbar Spine Disorders: A Propensity-Matched Analysis From the National Neurosurgical Quality and Outcomes Database Registry
- PMID: 26579968
- DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001118
Benefit of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion vs Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Lumbar Spine Disorders: A Propensity-Matched Analysis From the National Neurosurgical Quality and Outcomes Database Registry
Abstract
Background: Despite increasing use and potential benefits of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) compared with posterolateral spinal fusion (PSF), previous studies have not documented improved clinical outcomes with TLIF vs PSF.
Objective: To compare the outcomes of TLIF with PSF in patients with spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, and adjacent level disease.
Methods: The National Neurosurgical Quality and Outcomes Database was queried for patients who had a lumbar fusion. Eighty-five percent (1722) of enrolled cases had 12-month follow-up data. There were 306 PSF patients and 1230 TLIF patients. PSF cases within each diagnostic subgroup were propensity-matched to patients who had TLIF. Sufficient propensity-matched controls were available for patients with spondylolisthesis (109), spinal stenosis (63), and adjacent segment disease (47).
Results: Operating room time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay were similar between PSF and TLIF in all 3 propensity-matched groups. In the spondylolisthesis group, there was a greater improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) with TLIF vs PSF at 3 months (19.4 vs 26.0, P = .009), 12 months (20.8 vs 29.3, P = .001), and in percentage reaching minimal clinically important difference at 12 months (80% vs 62%, P = .007). There were no differences in ODI improvement between PSF and TLIF in the stenosis or adjacent segment disease groups.
Conclusion: TLIF generated more favorable ODI outcomes than PSF for patients with spondylolisthesis, but not for patients with spinal stenosis or adjacent segment disease. There was also equivalence in operating room time and estimated blood loss between TLIF and PSF, potentially altering the long-standing assumption that PSF is a simpler procedure.
Abbreviations: ASA, American Society of AnesthesiologistsEBL, estimated blood lossEQ-5D, EuroQOL-5DHRQOL, health-related quality of lifeMCID, minimal clinically important differenceNQOD, National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes DatabaseNRS, numeric rating scaleODI, Oswestry Disability IndexOR, operating roomPSF, posterolateral spinal fusionTLIF, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Comment in
-
Letter: Benefit of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion vs Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Lumbar Spine Disorders: A Propensity-Matched Analysis From the National Neurosurgical Quality and Outcomes Database Registry.Neurosurgery. 2017 Jul 1;81(1):E11-E13. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx061. Neurosurgery. 2017. PMID: 28368477 No abstract available.
-
In Reply: Benefit of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion vs Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Lumbar Spine Disorders: A Propensity-Matched Analysis From the National Neurosurgical Quality and Outcomes Database Registry.Neurosurgery. 2017 Jul 1;81(1):E14-E15. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx062. Neurosurgery. 2017. PMID: 28368481 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Modeled cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis using N(2)QOD data.J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jun;24(6):916-21. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.SPINE15917. Epub 2016 Feb 19. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016. PMID: 26895529
-
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry.Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Jan;54(1):E2. doi: 10.3171/2022.10.FOCUS22602. Neurosurg Focus. 2023. PMID: 36587409
-
Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Feb;26(2):208-219. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.SPINE151543. Epub 2016 Oct 21. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017. PMID: 27767682
-
Posterolateral fusion (PLF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Spine J. 2018 Jun;18(6):1088-1098. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.028. Epub 2018 Feb 13. Spine J. 2018. PMID: 29452283
-
Minimally Invasive Versus Traditional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis Grades 1 and 2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb;122:180-189. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.202. Epub 2018 Nov 7. World Neurosurg. 2019. PMID: 30414524
Cited by
-
The technical feasibility and preliminary results of minimally invasive endoscopic-TLIF based on electromagnetic navigation: a case series.BMC Surg. 2021 Mar 20;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01148-9. BMC Surg. 2021. PMID: 33743668 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Outcome Data Using Different Techniques for Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Large Single-Center Study.Asian Spine J. 2023 Oct;17(5):807-817. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0448. Epub 2023 Oct 4. Asian Spine J. 2023. PMID: 37788973 Free PMC article.
-
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylosis: A meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Oct;95(40):e4995. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004995. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016. PMID: 27749558 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics of interbody bone graft fusion after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion according to intervertebral space division.Front Surg. 2022 Oct 25;9:1004230. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1004230. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 36386508 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis secondary to ligamentum flavum hypertrophy using percutaneous endoscopy through interlaminar approach: a retrospective study.J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Aug 18;15(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01874-5. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020. Retraction in: J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jul 08;16(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02593-1. PMID: 32811508 Free PMC article. Retracted.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical