Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;38(1):41-5.
doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0189-x. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

Medication reviews in primary care in Sweden: importance of clinical pharmacists' recommendations on drug-related problems

Affiliations

Medication reviews in primary care in Sweden: importance of clinical pharmacists' recommendations on drug-related problems

Sara Modig et al. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Background: One way of preventing and solving drug-related problems in frail elderly is to perform team-based medication reviews.

Objective: To evaluate the quality of the clinical pharmacy service to primary care using structured medication reviews, focusing on the clinical significance of the recommendations made by clinical pharmacists.

Setting: A random sample of 150 patients (out of 1541) who received structured team based medication reviews. The patients lived at a geriatric nursing home or were ≥65 years and lived in ordinary housing with medication-related community help.

Method: Based on information on symptoms, kidney function, blood pressure, diagnoses and the medication list, a pharmacist identified possible drug-related problems and supplied recommendations for the general practitioner to act on. Two independent physicians retrospectively ranked the clinical significance of the recommendations according to Hatoum, with rankings ranging between 1 (adverse significance) and 6 (extremely significant). Main outcome measure The clinical significance of the recommendations. Results In total 349 drug-related problems were identified, leading to recommendations. The vast majority of the recommendations (96 %) were judged to have significance 3 or higher and more than the half were judged to have significance 4 or higher.

Conclusion: The high proportion of clinically significant recommendations provided by pharmacists when performing team-based medication reviews suggest that these clinical pharmacy services have potential to increase prescribing quality. As such, the medication reviews have the potential for contributing to a better and safer drug therapy for elderly patients.

Keywords: Clinical significance; DRP; Drug-related problem; Medication review; Primary care; Sweden.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Drugs Aging. 2013 Apr;30(4):235-46 - PubMed
    1. Drugs Aging. 1998 Jun;12(6):485-94 - PubMed
    1. Lakartidningen. 2008 Mar 18-Apr 1;105(12-13):894-8 - PubMed
    1. Exp Gerontol. 2004 Nov-Dec;39(11-12):1731-8 - PubMed
    1. Aust Fam Physician. 2012 Dec;41(12):924-8 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources