Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review

Advanced Neuroimaging of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

In: Translational Research in Traumatic Brain Injury. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor and Francis Group; 2016. Chapter 13.
Affiliations
Free Books & Documents
Review

Advanced Neuroimaging of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Inga K Koerte et al.
Free Books & Documents

Excerpt

In the acute clinical setting both computed tomography (CT) and conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are established imaging modalities to rule out severe complications resulting from traumatic brain injury (TBI) such as skull fracture, intracranial hemorrhage, and brain edema. However, when applied to mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) only about 10% of CT scans and 30% of MR scans reveal abnormalities such as subdural or subarachnoidal hemorrhage.– Moreover, conventional CT and MRI have proven insensitive to more subtle changes in the brain such as diffuse axonal injury, the most common injury present in mTBI. Furthermore, these conventional imaging modalities do not provide accurate information relevant to long-term prognosis.,,

In search of radiological evidence for mTBI, what are needed are highly sensitive, as well as objective measures of early detection (diagnosis) and accurate prognosis. Several promising advances in neuroimaging techniques are currently available and will be evaluated here. We review promising imaging techniques and their application to understanding brain abnormalities following mTBI and repetitive brain trauma. These imaging techniques include techniques to understand brain structure (high-resolution structural MR imaging) and tissue architecture (diffusion tensor imaging), techniques to understand regional blood flow (dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging, arterial spin labeling, single photon emission tomography), techniques to evaluate microhemorrhages (susceptibility-weighted imaging), and, finally, techniques used as indirect measures of neuronal activation (functional MR imaging) and brain metabolism (positron-emission tomography, MR spectroscopy).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Borg J et al. Non-surgical intervention and cost for mild traumatic brain injury: Results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Rehabil Med. 2004:76–83. - PubMed
    1. Hesselink J.R et al. MR imaging of brain contusions: A comparative study with CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;150:1133–1142. - PubMed
    1. Mittl R.L et al. Prevalence of MR evidence of diffuse axonal injury in patients with mild head injury and normal head CT findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15:1583–1589. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shenton M.E et al. A review of magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging findings in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Imaging Behav. 2012;6:137–192. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iverson G.L. Outcome from mild traumatic brain injury. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2005;18:301–317. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources