Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep 18:9:458-66.
doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.09.006. eCollection 2015.

Frontal gray matter abnormalities predict seizure outcome in refractory temporal lobe epilepsy patients

Affiliations

Frontal gray matter abnormalities predict seizure outcome in refractory temporal lobe epilepsy patients

Gaelle E Doucet et al. Neuroimage Clin. .

Abstract

Developing more reliable predictors of seizure outcome following temporal lobe surgery for intractable epilepsy is an important clinical goal. In this context, we investigated patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) before and after temporal resection. In detail, we explored gray matter (GM) volume change in relation with seizure outcome, using a voxel-based morphometry (VBM) approach. To do so, this study was divided into two parts. The first one involved group analysis of differences in regional GM volume between the groups (good outcome (GO), e.g., no seizures after surgery; poor outcome (PO), e.g., persistent postoperative seizures; and controls, N = 24 in each group), pre- and post-surgery. The second part of the study focused on pre-surgical data only (N = 61), determining whether the degree of GM abnormalities can predict surgical outcomes. For this second step, GM abnormalities were identified, within each lobe, in each patient when compared with an ad hoc sample of age-matched controls. For the first analysis, the results showed larger GM atrophy, mostly in the frontal lobe, in PO patients, relative to both GO patients and controls, pre-surgery. When comparing pre-to-post changes, we found relative GM gains in the GO but not in the PO patients, mostly in the non-resected hemisphere. For the second analysis, only the frontal lobe displayed reliable prediction of seizure outcome. 81% of the patients showing pre-surgical increased GM volume in the frontal lobe became seizure free, post-surgery; while 77% of the patients with pre-surgical reduced frontal GM volume had refractory seizures, post-surgery. A regression analysis revealed that the proportion of voxels with reduced frontal GM volume was a significant predictor of seizure outcome (p = 0.014). Importantly, having less than 1% of the frontal voxels with GM atrophy increased the likelihood of being seizure-free, post-surgery, by seven times. Overall, our results suggest that using pre-surgical GM abnormalities within the frontal lobe is a reliable predictor of seizure outcome post-surgery in TLE. We believe that this frontal GM atrophy captures seizure burden outside the pre-existing ictal temporal lobe, reflecting either the development of epileptogenesis or the loss of a protective, adaptive force helping to control or limit seizures. This study provides evidence of the potential of VBM-based approaches to predict surgical outcomes in refractory TLE candidates.

Keywords: Brain surgery; Frontal GM abnormalities; Refractory temporal lobe epilepsy; Seizure outcome; Voxel-based morphometry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Regions showing significantly more GM volume in the GO than in the PO patients, pre-surgery.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Regions showing relative gain of GM volume post-surgery, relative to pre-surgery, in the GO patients.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Proportion of GO or PO patients with significantly increased or reduced GM volume (relative to controls) within the frontal lobe, pre-surgery.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Result of the logistic regression predicting seizure outcome, using the measure of the proportion of voxels with reduced GM volume in the frontal lobe. Part A shows the predictive probability of GO or PO group membership. Part B displays the resulting classification count, N.B., GO patients are better classified (N = 29/34).

References

    1. Adam C., Saint-Hilaire J.M., Richer F. Temporal and spatial characteristics of intracerebral seizure propagation: predictive value in surgery for temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1994;35(5):1065–1072. - PubMed
    1. Bernhardt B.C., Bernasconi N., Concha L., Bernasconi A. Cortical thickness analysis in temporal lobe epilepsy: reproducibility and relation to outcome. Neurology. 2010;74(22):1776–1784. - PubMed
    1. Bernhardt B.C., Hong S.J., Bernasconi A., Bernasconi N. Magnetic resonance imaging pattern learning in temporal lobe epilepsy: classification and prognostics. Ann. Neurol. 2015;77(3):436–446. - PubMed
    1. Bettus G., Guedj E., Joyeux F., Confort-Gouny S., Soulier E., Laguitton V., Cozzone P.J., Chauvel P., Ranjeva J.P., Bartolomei F., Guye M. Decreased basal fMRI functional connectivity in epileptogenic networks and contralateral compensatory mechanisms. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2009;30(5):1580–1591. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonilha L., Helpern J.A., Sainju R., Nesland T., Edwards J.C., Glazier S.S., Tabesh A. Presurgical connectome and postsurgical seizure control in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology. 2013;81(19):1704–1710. - PMC - PubMed