Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug;23(4):1214-20.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0980-7.

The influence of contextual diversity on word learning

Affiliations

The influence of contextual diversity on word learning

Brendan T Johns et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Aug.

Abstract

In a series of analyses over mega datasets, Jones, Johns, and Recchia (Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(2), 115-124, 2012) and Johns et al. (Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132:2, EL74-EL80, 2012) found that a measure of contextual diversity that takes into account the semantic variability of a word's contexts provided a better fit to both visual and spoken word recognition data than traditional measures, such as word frequency or raw context counts. This measure was empirically validated with an artificial language experiment (Jones et al.). The present study extends the empirical results with a unique natural language learning paradigm, which allows for an examination of the semantic representations that are acquired as semantic diversity is varied. Subjects were incidentally exposed to novel words as they rated short selections from articles, books, and newspapers. When novel words were encountered across distinct discourse contexts, subjects were both faster and more accurate at recognizing them than when they were seen in redundant contexts. However, learning across redundant contexts promoted the development of more stable semantic representations. These findings are predicted by a distributional learning model trained on the same materials as our subjects.

Keywords: Computational modeling; Language comprehension; Semantic memory; Word recognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Psychol Rev. 2004 Jul;111(3):721-56 - PubMed
    1. Behav Res Methods. 2007 Aug;39(3):445-59 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Psychol. 1951 Jun;41(6):401-10 - PubMed
    1. Psychol Rev. 2001 Apr;108(2):452-78 - PubMed
    1. Psychol Rev. 2002 Jan;109(1):35-54; discussion 55-74 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources