Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov 23;10(11):e0127662.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127662. eCollection 2015.

Lack of Evidence for Molecular Mimicry in HIV-Infected Subjects

Affiliations

Lack of Evidence for Molecular Mimicry in HIV-Infected Subjects

Peter D Burbelo et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Previous studies in HIV patients have reported autoantibodies to several human proteins, including erythropoietin (EPO), interferon-α (IFN-α), interleukin-2 (IL-2), and HLA-DR, as potential mediators of anemia or immunosuppression. The etiology of these autoantibodies has been attributed to molecular mimicry between HIV epitopes and self-proteins. Here, the Luciferase Immunoprecipitation System (LIPS) was used to investigate the presence of such autoantibodies in HIV-infected adults. High levels of antibodies to HIV proteins such as capsid (p24), matrix (p17), envelope (gp41), and reverse transcriptase (RT) were detected using LIPS in both untreated and anti-retroviral-treated HIV-infected individuals but not in uninfected controls. LIPS readily detected anti-EPO autoantibodies in serum samples from subjects with presumptive pure red cell aplasia but not in any of the samples from HIV-infected or uninfected individuals. Similarly, subjects with HIV lacked autoantibodies to IFN-α, IL-2, HLA-DR and the immunoglobulin lambda light chain; all purported targets of molecular mimicry. While molecular mimicry between pathogen proteins and self-proteins is a commonly proposed mechanism for autoantibody production, the findings presented here indicate such a process is not common in HIV disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Antibody responses to HIV proteins.
LIPS was used to detect antibodies against four HIV proteins in eight healthy controls (HC), HIV-infected subjects before ART (n = 60), and after ART (n = 27). The level of antibody (in LU) against the HIV proteins p24 (A), p17 (B), gp41 (C), and RT (D) is plotted on the y-axis using a log10 scale. Each symbol in the graph represents one sample from one subject. The horizontal line represents the median LU value in each group. Statistically significant differences were calculated with the Mann-Whitney U test and only statistically significant values are shown.
Fig 2
Fig 2. No evidence of anti-EPO autoantibodies in HIV patients.
Negative (Neg) and positive (Pos) control (CTRL) monoclonal antibodies (MAB) to EPO, as well as anti-EPO Neg and Pos CTRL clinical sera were assayed using LIPS. Two of the anti-EPO monoclonal antibodies were of the IgM isotype (marked by stars), which is an immunoglobulin isotype that binds poorly to protein A/G beads. Anti-EPO antibody levels were also measured in eight healthy controls (HC), HIV patients before ART (n = 60), and after 3–7 years of ART (n = 27). The anti-EPO antibody levels in LU are plotted on the y-axis using a log10 scale. The median anti-EPO antibody level in the healthy controls and HIV patient groups are shown by the horizontal line. The dotted line represents the cut-off value for determining seropositivity for EPO.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Lack of autoantibodies against IFN-α, IL-2, HLA-DR, and λ-LC in HIV-infected subjects.
Autoantibody levels in LU as determined by LIPS are shown for (A) IFN-α, (B) IL-2, (C) HLA-DR, and (D) λ-LC on the y-axis using a log10 scale. The LU value for each of the positive control antibodies (closed squares) used to validate the assays is shown in its respective plot. The dotted line represents the cut-off value for determining seropositivity.

References

    1. Atassi MZ, Casali P (2008) Molecular mechanisms of autoimmunity. Autoimmunity 41: 123–132. 10.1080/08916930801929021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cusick MF, Libbey JE, Fujinami RS (2012) Molecular mimicry as a mechanism of autoimmune disease. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 42: 102–111. 10.1007/s12016-011-8293-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rose NR, Mackay IR (2000) Molecular mimicry: a critical look at exemplary instances in human diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci 57: 542–551. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sloand EM, Pitt E, Chiarello RJ, Nemo GJ (1991) HIV testing. State of the art. JAMA 266: 2861–2866. - PubMed
    1. Burbelo PD, Bayat A, Rhodes CS, Hoh R, Martin JN, Fromentin R, et al. (2014) HIV antibody characterization as a method to quantify reservoir size during curative interventions. J Infect Dis 209: 1613–1617. 10.1093/infdis/jit667 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources