Hypnosis for Acute Procedural Pain: A Critical Review
- PMID: 26599994
- PMCID: PMC5120961
- DOI: 10.1080/00207144.2015.1099405
Hypnosis for Acute Procedural Pain: A Critical Review
Abstract
Clinical evidence for the effectiveness of hypnosis in the treatment of acute procedural pain was critically evaluated based on reports from randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). Results from the 29 RCTs meeting inclusion criteria suggest that hypnosis decreases pain compared to standard care and attention control groups and that it is at least as effective as comparable adjunct psychological or behavioral therapies. In addition, applying hypnosis in multiple sessions prior to the day of the procedure produced the highest percentage of significant results. Hypnosis was most effective in minor surgical procedures. However, interpretations are limited by considerable risk of bias. Further studies using minimally effective control conditions and systematic control of intervention dose and timing are required to strengthen conclusions.
Conflict of interest statement
No conflicts of interest exist.
References
-
- Accardi MC, Milling LS. The effectiveness of hypnosis for reducing procedure-related pain in children and adolescents: a comprehensive methodological review. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2009;32(4):328–339. - PubMed
-
- Askay SW, Patterson DR, Jensen MP, Sharar SR. A randomized controlled trial of hypnosis for burn wound care. Rehabilitation Psychology. 2007;52(3):247–253.
-
- Bányai EI, Hilgard ER. A comparison of active-alert hypnotic induction with traditional relaxation induction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1976;85:218–224. - PubMed
-
- Bowers KS. Imagination and dissociation in hypnotic responding. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis. 1992;40:253–275. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical