Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Mar;126(3):616-9.
doi: 10.1002/lary.25439. Epub 2015 Nov 24.

Development and evaluation of a rigid esophagoscopy simulator for residency training

Affiliations

Development and evaluation of a rigid esophagoscopy simulator for residency training

Amir Allak et al. Laryngoscope. 2016 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives/hypothesis: Rigid esophagoscopy is performed less frequently by resident trainees. Nonetheless, it remains important for certain indications, including foreign body extraction. This study describes the construction of a simulator and evaluates its utility in training residents.

Study design: Simulator development, fabrication, and procedural evaluation of postgraduate trainees.

Methods: A simulator was developed and constructed in collaboration with a biomedical engineering team. Residents with varied experience in upper aerodigestive procedures performed rigid esophagoscopy on the model. Key steps and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) criteria for rigid esophagoscopy were evaluated by a faculty surgeon. Pressure measurements were obtained from force sensors at the tip of the endoscope and incisors.

Results: Fourteen trainees were evaluated. Operative rigid esophagoscopy and direct laryngoscopy case numbers were noted for each subject. OSATS scores and key steps of the procedure correlated with resident experience (R(2) = 0.75, P < .0001 and R(2) = 0.66, P < .001, respectively). Maximal pressure exerted on the simulator esophagus by the esophagoscope was inversely correlated with case number and was statistically significant (R(2) = 0.51, P = .02), whereas length of procedure did not correlate (R(2) = 0.04, P = .49). Maximal pressure on the incisors did not correlate (R(2) = 0.25, P = .15).

Conclusions: A simulator for training residents to perform rigid esophagoscopy was developed and utilized by a faculty proctor to objectively evaluate trainees. OSATS scores, performance of key procedural steps, and pressure exerted on the simulator tissue correlated with upper aerodigestive cases performed, demonstrating validity of the simulator.

Level of evidence: NA Laryngoscope, 126:616-619, 2016.

Keywords: Esophagoscopy; head and neck surgery; laryngology; simulation; simulator; training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources